public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <maurochehab@gmail.com>
To: Florent AUDEBERT <florent.audebert@anevia.com>, abraham.manu@gmail.com
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Florent Audebert <faudebert@anevia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stb0899: Removed an extra byte sent at init on DiSEqC bus
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:05:32 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CBDC1CC.6030704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CBD9543.2050107@anevia.com>

Em 19-10-2010 10:55, Florent AUDEBERT escreveu:
> On 06/11/2010 06:01 PM, Florent AUDEBERT wrote:
>> I noticed a stray 0x00 at init on DiSEqC bus (KNC1 DVB-S2) with a DiSEqC
>> tool analyzer.
>>
>> I removed the register from initialization table and all seem to go well
>> (at least for my KNC board).
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This old small patch had been marked superseded on patchwork[1].
> 
> Is there an non-obvious case when patches go superseded ? Perhaps I missed
> something but it seems to me no other patch replaced it.

This is one of the bad things with patchwork: there's no "reason" field associated
to a status change, nor it marks when the status were changed.

A search on my linux-media box, showed that this patch were there, waiting for
Manu review, at the email I sent on Jul, 6 2010. The patch still applies, and
I didn't find any reply from Manu giving any feedback about it.

So, I'm re-tagging it as under review.

Manu, any comments about this patch (and the other remaining patches that we're
waiting fro your review) ?

> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105621/
> 

Cheers,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-19 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-11 16:01 [PATCH] stb0899: Removed an extra byte sent at init on DiSEqC bus Florent AUDEBERT
2010-10-19 12:55 ` Florent AUDEBERT
2010-10-19 16:05   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2011-06-01 13:57     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-06-01 16:24       ` Manu Abraham
2011-06-01 18:56         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CBDC1CC.6030704@gmail.com \
    --to=maurochehab@gmail.com \
    --cc=abraham.manu@gmail.com \
    --cc=faudebert@anevia.com \
    --cc=florent.audebert@anevia.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox