From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:37998 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753840Ab0JSQFl (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:05:41 -0400 Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so569373pwj.19 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:05:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CBDC1CC.6030704@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:05:32 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florent AUDEBERT , abraham.manu@gmail.com CC: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Florent Audebert Subject: Re: [PATCH] stb0899: Removed an extra byte sent at init on DiSEqC bus References: <4C125DD5.6060604@anevia.com> <4CBD9543.2050107@anevia.com> In-Reply-To: <4CBD9543.2050107@anevia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: Sender: Em 19-10-2010 10:55, Florent AUDEBERT escreveu: > On 06/11/2010 06:01 PM, Florent AUDEBERT wrote: >> I noticed a stray 0x00 at init on DiSEqC bus (KNC1 DVB-S2) with a DiSEqC >> tool analyzer. >> >> I removed the register from initialization table and all seem to go well >> (at least for my KNC board). > > Hi, > > This old small patch had been marked superseded on patchwork[1]. > > Is there an non-obvious case when patches go superseded ? Perhaps I missed > something but it seems to me no other patch replaced it. This is one of the bad things with patchwork: there's no "reason" field associated to a status change, nor it marks when the status were changed. A search on my linux-media box, showed that this patch were there, waiting for Manu review, at the email I sent on Jul, 6 2010. The patch still applies, and I didn't find any reply from Manu giving any feedback about it. So, I'm re-tagging it as under review. Manu, any comments about this patch (and the other remaining patches that we're waiting fro your review) ? > > > Regards, > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/105621/ > Cheers, Mauro