From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Devin Heitmueller <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>
Subject: Re: Removal of V4L1 drivers
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:55:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D14FA97.50303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201012241958.31275.hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Hi,
On 12/24/2010 07:58 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday, December 24, 2010 15:47:57 Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/24/2010 02:42 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> Hi Hans, Mauro,
>>>
>>> The se401, vicam, ibmcam and konicawc drivers are the only V4L1 drivers left in
>>> 2.6.37. The others are either converted or moved to staging (stradis and cpia),
>>> ready to be removed.
>>>
>>> Hans, what is the status of those four drivers?
>>
>> se401:
>> I have hardware I have taken a look at the driver, converting it is a bit
>> of a pain because it uses a really ugly written statefull decompressor inside
>> the kernel code. The cameras have an uncompressed mode too. I can start doing
>> a conversion to / rewrite as gspca subdriver supporting only the uncompressed
>> mode for now:
>>
>> vicam:
>> Devin Heitmueller (added to the CC) has one such a camera, which he still needs
>> to get into my hands, once I have it I can convert the driver.
>
> I think these two should be moved to staging for 2.6.38. And either removed or
> converted for 2.6.39.
>
Ok.
>> ibmcam and konicawc:
>> Both drivers were converted by me recently and the new gspca subdrivers for these
>> have been pulled by Mauro for 2.6.37 .
>
> So these two can be removed in 2.6.38, right?
Right.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-24 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-24 13:42 Removal of V4L1 drivers Hans Verkuil
2010-12-24 14:47 ` Hans de Goede
2010-12-24 18:58 ` Hans Verkuil
2010-12-24 19:55 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2010-12-25 9:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-12-25 9:40 ` Hans Verkuil
2010-12-25 9:11 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-12-25 9:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D14FA97.50303@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=dheitmueller@kernellabs.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox