From: David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DVB: TechnoTrend CT-3650 IR support
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:02:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D18E2D2.8020400@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D18C413.3020300@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5689 bytes --]
On 2010-12-27 17:51, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 27-12-2010 13:54, David Henningsson escreveu:
>> On 2010-12-27 10:54, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em 26-12-2010 17:38, David Henningsson escreveu:
>>>> On 2010-12-26 12:41, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>>>> +/* command to poll IR receiver (copied from pctv452e.c) */
>>>> +#define CMD_GET_IR_CODE 0x1b
>>>> +
>>>> +/* IR */
>>>> +static int tt3650_rc_query(struct dvb_usb_device *d)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> + u8 rx[9]; /* A CMD_GET_IR_CODE reply is 9 bytes long */
>>>> + ret = ttusb2_msg(d, CMD_GET_IR_CODE, NULL, 0, rx, sizeof(rx));
>>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (rx[8]& 0x01) {
>>>
>>> Maybe (rx[8]& 0x01) == 0 indicates a keyup event. If so, if you map both keydown
>>> and keyup events, the in-kernel repeat logic will work.
>>
>> Hmm. If I should fix keyup events, the most reliable version would probably be something like:
>>
>> if (rx[8]& 0x01) {
>> int currentkey = rx[2]; // or (rx[3]<< 8) | rx[2];
>> if (currentkey == lastkey)
>> rc_repeat(lastkey);
>> else {
>> if (lastkey)
>> rc_keyup(lastkey);
>> lastkey = currentkey;
>> rc_keydown(currentkey);
>> }
>
> rc_keydown() already handles repeat events (see ir_do_keydown and rc_keydown, at
> rc-main.c), so, you don't need it.
>
>> }
>> else if (lastkey) {
>> rc_keyup(lastkey);
>> lastkey = 0;
>> }
>
> Yeah, this makes sense, if bit 1 of rx[8] indicates keyup/keydown or repeat.
>
> You need to double check if you are not receiving any packet with this bit unset,
> when you press and hold a key, as some devices use a bit to just indicate that
> the info there is valid or not (a "done" bit).
As far as I can understand, a value of "1" indicates that a key is
currently pressed, and a value of "0" indicates that no key is pressed.
>
>>
>> Does this sound reasonable to you?
>>
>>>
>>>> + /* got a "press" event */
>>>> + deb_info("%s: cmd=0x%02x sys=0x%02x\n", __func__, rx[2], rx[3]);
>>>> + rc_keydown(d->rc_dev, rx[2], 0);
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> As you're receiving both command+address, please use the complete code:
>>> rc_keydown(d->rc_dev, (rx[3]<< 8) | rx[2], 0);
>>
>> I've tried this, but it stops working. evtest shows only scancode events, so my guess is that this makes it incompatible with RC_MAP_TT_1500, which lists only the lower byte.
>
> yeah, you'll need either to create another table or to fix it. The better is to fix
> the table and to use .scanmask = 0xff at the old drivers. This way, the same table
> will work for both the legacy/incomplete get_scancode function and for the new one.
Ok. I did a grep for RC_MAP_TT_1500 and found one place only, so I'm
attaching two patches that should fix this, feel free to commit them if
they look good to you.
>>> Also as it is receiving 8 bytes from the device, maybe the IR decoding logic is
>>> capable of decoding more than just one protocol. Such feature is nice, as it
>>> allows replacing the original keycode table by a more complete one.
>>
>> I've tried dumping all nine bytes but I can't make much out of it as I'm unfamiliar with RC protocols and decoders.
>>
>> Typical reply is (no key pressed):
>>
>> cc 35 0b 15 00 03 00 00 00
>>
>> Does this tell you anything?
>
> This means nothing to me, but the only way to double check is to test the device
> with other remote controllers. On several hardware, it is possible to use
> RC5 remote controllers as well. As there are some empty (zero) fields, maybe
> this device also supports RC6 protocols (that have more than 16 bits) and
> NEC extended (24 bits or 32 bits, on a few variants).
Ok.
>>> One of the most interesting features of the new RC code is that it offers
>>> a sysfs class and some additional logic to allow dynamically change/replace
>>> the keymaps and keycodes via userspace. The idea is to remove all in-kernel
>>> keymaps in the future, using, instead, the userspace way, via ir-keytable
>>> tool, available at:
>>> http://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git
>>>
>>> The tool already supports auto-loading the keymap via udev.
>>>
>>> For IR's where we don't know the protocol or that we don't have the full scancode,
>>> loading the keymap via userspace will not bring any new feature. But, for those
>>> devices where we can be sure about the protocol and for those that also allow
>>> using other protocols, users can just replace the device-provided IR with a more
>>> powerful remote controller with more keys.
>>
>> Yeah, that sounds like a really nice feature.
>>
>>> So, it would be wonderful if you could identify what's the supported protocol(s)
>>> instead of using RC_TYPE_UNKNOWN. You can double check the protocol if you have
>>> with you another RC device that supports raw decoding. The rc-core internal decoders
>>> will tell you what protocol was used to decode a keycode, if you enable debug.
>>
>> I don't have any such RC receiver device. I do have a Logitech Harmony 525, so I tried pointing that one towards the CT 3650, but CMD_GET_IR_CODE didn't change for any of the devices I've currently told my Harmony to emulate.
>>
>> So I don't really see how I can help further in this case?
>
> I don't have a Logitech Harmony, so I'm not sure about it. Maybe Jarod may have some
> info about it.
Would you like me to provide a patch with RC_TYPE_UNKNOWN at this point
(i e what I showed you earlier + your review comments), and when I or
somebody else can provide more complete information, we make an
additional patch with better protocol support? Does that make sense to you?
--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
http://launchpad.net/~diwic
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-DVB-Set-scanmask-for-Budget-SAA7146-cards.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1045 bytes --]
>From 7435de9c183fa2b62c03311ae8e08ddd436cb287 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:41:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] DVB: Set scanmask for Budget/SAA7146 cards
These devices do not return the full command+address, so set
scanmask accordingly.
Signed-off-by: David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>
---
drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/budget-ci.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/budget-ci.c b/drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/budget-ci.c
index 8ae67c1..b82756d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/budget-ci.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/budget-ci.c
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ static int msp430_ir_init(struct budget_ci *budget_ci)
dev->input_phys = budget_ci->ir.phys;
dev->input_id.bustype = BUS_PCI;
dev->input_id.version = 1;
+ dev->scanmask = 0xff;
if (saa->pci->subsystem_vendor) {
dev->input_id.vendor = saa->pci->subsystem_vendor;
dev->input_id.product = saa->pci->subsystem_device;
--
1.7.1
[-- Attachment #3: 0002-MEDIA-RC-Provide-full-scancodes-for-TT-1500-remote-c.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2897 bytes --]
>From 404319567f67d5c63001239ca4f960aaf775a075 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:45:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] MEDIA: RC: Provide full scancodes for TT-1500 remote control
Add 0x15 prefix to scancodes for TT-1500 remote control.
Signed-off-by: David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>
---
drivers/media/rc/keymaps/rc-tt-1500.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/keymaps/rc-tt-1500.c b/drivers/media/rc/keymaps/rc-tt-1500.c
index bb19487..295f373 100644
--- a/drivers/media/rc/keymaps/rc-tt-1500.c
+++ b/drivers/media/rc/keymaps/rc-tt-1500.c
@@ -15,45 +15,45 @@
/* for the Technotrend 1500 bundled remotes (grey and black): */
static struct rc_map_table tt_1500[] = {
- { 0x01, KEY_POWER },
- { 0x02, KEY_SHUFFLE }, /* ? double-arrow key */
- { 0x03, KEY_1 },
- { 0x04, KEY_2 },
- { 0x05, KEY_3 },
- { 0x06, KEY_4 },
- { 0x07, KEY_5 },
- { 0x08, KEY_6 },
- { 0x09, KEY_7 },
- { 0x0a, KEY_8 },
- { 0x0b, KEY_9 },
- { 0x0c, KEY_0 },
- { 0x0d, KEY_UP },
- { 0x0e, KEY_LEFT },
- { 0x0f, KEY_OK },
- { 0x10, KEY_RIGHT },
- { 0x11, KEY_DOWN },
- { 0x12, KEY_INFO },
- { 0x13, KEY_EXIT },
- { 0x14, KEY_RED },
- { 0x15, KEY_GREEN },
- { 0x16, KEY_YELLOW },
- { 0x17, KEY_BLUE },
- { 0x18, KEY_MUTE },
- { 0x19, KEY_TEXT },
- { 0x1a, KEY_MODE }, /* ? TV/Radio */
- { 0x21, KEY_OPTION },
- { 0x22, KEY_EPG },
- { 0x23, KEY_CHANNELUP },
- { 0x24, KEY_CHANNELDOWN },
- { 0x25, KEY_VOLUMEUP },
- { 0x26, KEY_VOLUMEDOWN },
- { 0x27, KEY_SETUP },
- { 0x3a, KEY_RECORD }, /* these keys are only in the black remote */
- { 0x3b, KEY_PLAY },
- { 0x3c, KEY_STOP },
- { 0x3d, KEY_REWIND },
- { 0x3e, KEY_PAUSE },
- { 0x3f, KEY_FORWARD },
+ { 0x1501, KEY_POWER },
+ { 0x1502, KEY_SHUFFLE }, /* ? double-arrow key */
+ { 0x1503, KEY_1 },
+ { 0x1504, KEY_2 },
+ { 0x1505, KEY_3 },
+ { 0x1506, KEY_4 },
+ { 0x1507, KEY_5 },
+ { 0x1508, KEY_6 },
+ { 0x1509, KEY_7 },
+ { 0x150a, KEY_8 },
+ { 0x150b, KEY_9 },
+ { 0x150c, KEY_0 },
+ { 0x150d, KEY_UP },
+ { 0x150e, KEY_LEFT },
+ { 0x150f, KEY_OK },
+ { 0x1510, KEY_RIGHT },
+ { 0x1511, KEY_DOWN },
+ { 0x1512, KEY_INFO },
+ { 0x1513, KEY_EXIT },
+ { 0x1514, KEY_RED },
+ { 0x1515, KEY_GREEN },
+ { 0x1516, KEY_YELLOW },
+ { 0x1517, KEY_BLUE },
+ { 0x1518, KEY_MUTE },
+ { 0x1519, KEY_TEXT },
+ { 0x151a, KEY_MODE }, /* ? TV/Radio */
+ { 0x1521, KEY_OPTION },
+ { 0x1522, KEY_EPG },
+ { 0x1523, KEY_CHANNELUP },
+ { 0x1524, KEY_CHANNELDOWN },
+ { 0x1525, KEY_VOLUMEUP },
+ { 0x1526, KEY_VOLUMEDOWN },
+ { 0x1527, KEY_SETUP },
+ { 0x153a, KEY_RECORD }, /* these keys are only in the black remote */
+ { 0x153b, KEY_PLAY },
+ { 0x153c, KEY_STOP },
+ { 0x153d, KEY_REWIND },
+ { 0x153e, KEY_PAUSE },
+ { 0x153f, KEY_FORWARD },
};
static struct rc_map_list tt_1500_map = {
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-27 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-26 9:14 [PATCH] DVB: TechnoTrend CT-3650 IR support David Henningsson
2010-12-26 11:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-12-26 19:38 ` David Henningsson
2010-12-27 9:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-12-27 15:54 ` David Henningsson
2010-12-27 16:51 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-12-27 19:02 ` David Henningsson [this message]
2010-12-27 21:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-12-29 12:04 ` David Henningsson
2010-12-29 12:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D18E2D2.8020400@canonical.com \
--to=david.henningsson@canonical.com \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox