public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:42:44 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D3EB734.5090100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110125053117.GD7850@core.coreip.homeip.net>

Em 25-01-2011 03:31, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:07:29AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> On 11-01-25 12:04 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
>>> On 11-01-24 11:55 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:37:06PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>>> ..
>>>>> This results in (map->size==10) for 2.6.36+ (wrong),
>>>>> and a much larger map->size for 2.6.35 and earlier.
>>>>>
>>>>> So perhaps EVIOCGKEYCODE has changed?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So the utility expects that all devices have flat scancode space and
>>>> driver might have changed so it does not recognize scancode 10 as valid
>>>> scancode anymore.
>>>>
>>>> The options are:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Convert to EVIOCGKEYCODE2
>>>> 2. Ignore errors from EVIOCGKEYCODE and go through all 65536 iterations.
>>>
>>> or 3. Revert/fix the in-kernel regression.
>>>
>>> The EVIOCGKEYCODE ioctl is supposed to return KEY_RESERVED for unmapped
>>> (but value) keycodes, and only return -EINVAL when the keycode itself
>>> is out of range.
>>>
>>> That's how it worked in all kernels prior to 2.6.36,
>>> and now it is broken.  It now returns -EINVAL for any unmapped keycode,
>>> even though keycodes higher than that still have mappings.
>>>
>>> This is a bug, a regression, and breaks userspace.
>>> I haven't identified *where* in the kernel the breakage happened,
>>> though.. that code confuses me.  :)
>>
>> Note that this device DOES have "flat scancode space",
>> and the kernel is now incorrectly signalling an error (-EINVAL)
>> in response to a perfectly valid query of a VALID (and mappable)
>> keycode on the remote control
>>
>> The code really is a valid button, it just doesn't have a default mapping
>> set by the kernel (I can set a mapping for that code from userspace and it works).
>>
> 
> OK, in this case let's ping Mauro - I think he done the adjustments to
> IR keymap hanlding.

I lost part of the thread, but a quick search via the Internet showed that you're using
the input tools to work with a Remote Controller, right? Are you using a vanilla
kernel, or are you using the media_build backports? There are some distros that are
using those backports also like Fedora 14.

In the latter case, I found the reason why the backports were not working and I fixed
it a couple days ago:
	http://git.linuxtv.org/media_build.git?a=commit;h=b83dc3e49d90527d8e1016d09e06f4842a6a847a

The issue is simple, and it is related on how the input.c used to handle EVIOSGKEYCODE.
Basically, before allowing you to change a key, it used to call EVIOCGKEYCODE to check
it that key exists. However, when you're creating a new association, the key didn't
exist, and, to be strict with input rules, EVIOCGKEYCODE should return -EINVAL.
To circumvent that behaviour, old versions were returning 0, and associating unmapped
scancodes to KEY_RESERVED. We used this workaround for a few kernel versions, while
we were discussing the improvements so support larger scancodes.

Yet, on all vanilla kernels, changing the keycode association works fine.

However, the backport patch at media_build were not taking this workaround into account,
and were just returning -EINVAL. So, the backported media drivers stopped allowing
some keytable changes. The patch above fixes it.

Cheers,
Mauro



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-25 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4D3C5F73.2050408@teksavvy.com>
     [not found] ` <20110124175456.GA17855@core.coreip.homeip.net>
     [not found]   ` <4D3E1A08.5060303@teksavvy.com>
     [not found]     ` <20110125005555.GA18338@core.coreip.homeip.net>
     [not found]       ` <4D3E4DD1.60705@teksavvy.com>
     [not found]         ` <20110125042016.GA7850@core.coreip.homeip.net>
     [not found]           ` <4D3E5372.9010305@teksavvy.com>
     [not found]             ` <20110125045559.GB7850@core.coreip.homeip.net>
     [not found]               ` <4D3E59CA.6070107@teksavvy.com>
     [not found]                 ` <4D3E5A91.30207@teksavvy.com>
2011-01-25  5:31                   ` 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ? Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25  6:52                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 14:42                       ` Extending rc-core/userspace to handle bigger scancodes - Was: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 16:55                         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26  9:44                           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 11:42                     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2011-01-25 14:32                       ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 16:48                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 20:09                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 20:54                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 21:01                             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 21:20                               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 21:50                                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 22:00                             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 22:22                               ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 23:29                                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26  2:00                                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 11:26                                     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 13:08                                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 14:18                                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 14:52                                           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 16:46                                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 16:51                                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 17:29                                             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 18:24                                               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:16                                                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:28                                                   ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 20:09                                                     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:28                                                   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 19:32                                                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 20:07                                                     ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:27                                                 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 14:58                                       ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 17:41                                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 17:59                                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:30                                             ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 15:05                                     ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 16:44                                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:31                                         ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:38                                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 17:32                                       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 19:33                                         ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:41                                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:47                                             ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:50                                               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 21:41                                                 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 21:49                                                   ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 22:07                                                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 22:04                                                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27  1:01                                       ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27  1:07                                         ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27  2:12                                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27  3:18                                             ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27  6:38                                               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 10:30                                                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-27 15:00                                                   ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 17:21                                                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 18:58                                                     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28  9:39                                                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 11:55                                                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 16:40                                                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 17:01                                                             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 17:33                                                               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 18:15                                                                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 18:34                                                                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 20:53                                                                     ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 14:54                                                 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 16:39                                               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 18:12                                                 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 19:53                                                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 16:42                                                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 20:55                                                       ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 21:03                                                         ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 21:09                                                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 22:25                               ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D3EB734.5090100@redhat.com \
    --to=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@teksavvy.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox