From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ?
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:30:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D40764B.5040306@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110126175918.GA29268@core.coreip.homeip.net>
On 11-01-26 12:59 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:41:01PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 26-01-2011 12:58, Mark Lord escreveu:
>>> On 11-01-26 06:26 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> ..
>>>> However, as said previously in this thread, input-kbd won't work with any
>>>> RC table that uses NEC extended (and there are several devices on the
>>>> current Kernels with those tables), since it only reads up to 16 bits.
>>>>
>>>> ir-keytable works with all RC tables, if you use a kernel equal or upper to
>>>> 2.6.36, due to the usage of the new ioctl's.
>>>
>>> Is there a way to control the key repeat rate for a device
>>> controlled by ir-kbd-i2c ?
>>>
>>> It appears to be limited to a max of between 4 and 5 repeats/sec somewhere,
>>> and I'd like to fix that.
>>
>> It depends on what device do you have. Several I2C chips have the repeat
>> logic inside the I2C microcontroller PROM firmware. or at the remote
>> controller itself. So, there's nothing we can do to change it.
>>
>> I have even one device here (I think it is a saa7134-based Kworld device)
>> that doesn't send any repeat event at all for most keys (I think it only
>> sends repeat events for volume - Can't remember the specific details anymore -
>> too many devices!).
>>
>> The devices that produce repeat events can be adjusted via the normal
>> input layer tools like kbdrate.
>>
>
> Unfortunately kbdrate affects all connected devices and I am not sure if
> there is a utility allowing to set rate on individual devices. But here
> is the main part:
>
> static int input_set_rate(int fd,
> unsigned int delay, unsigned int period)
> {
> unsigned int rep[2] = { delay, period };
>
> if (ioctl(fd, EVIOCSREP, rep) < 0) {
> perror("evdev ioctl");
> return -1;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
Okay, if that's still a global in this day and age,
then I suppose I'll just have to special-case it here in my copy.
The hardware itself is capable of much faster repeat rates,
and prior to 2.6.36 I used to patch it for intelligent ramp-up
on repeats inside ir-kbd-i2c.
As of 2.6.36 that stopped working, and is now limited somewhere
to no more than one repeat every 210msecs.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4D3C5F73.2050408@teksavvy.com>
[not found] ` <20110124175456.GA17855@core.coreip.homeip.net>
[not found] ` <4D3E1A08.5060303@teksavvy.com>
[not found] ` <20110125005555.GA18338@core.coreip.homeip.net>
[not found] ` <4D3E4DD1.60705@teksavvy.com>
[not found] ` <20110125042016.GA7850@core.coreip.homeip.net>
[not found] ` <4D3E5372.9010305@teksavvy.com>
[not found] ` <20110125045559.GB7850@core.coreip.homeip.net>
[not found] ` <4D3E59CA.6070107@teksavvy.com>
[not found] ` <4D3E5A91.30207@teksavvy.com>
2011-01-25 5:31 ` 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ? Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 6:52 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 14:42 ` Extending rc-core/userspace to handle bigger scancodes - Was: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 16:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 9:44 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 11:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 14:32 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 16:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 20:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 21:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-25 21:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 22:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-25 22:22 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-25 23:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 2:00 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 11:26 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 13:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 14:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 14:52 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 16:46 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 16:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 17:29 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 18:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:16 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:28 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 20:09 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 19:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 20:07 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-26 19:27 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 14:58 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 17:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 17:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:30 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2011-01-26 15:05 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 16:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:31 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 17:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-26 19:33 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 19:47 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 19:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 21:41 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 21:49 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-26 22:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-26 22:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 1:01 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 1:07 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 2:12 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 3:18 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 6:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 10:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-27 15:00 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 17:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 18:58 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 9:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 11:55 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 16:40 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 17:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 17:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 18:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-01-28 18:34 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 20:53 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 14:54 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 16:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-27 18:12 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 19:53 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 16:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-28 20:55 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 21:03 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 21:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-01-25 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D40764B.5040306@teksavvy.com \
--to=kernel@teksavvy.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox