From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net ([165.212.64.31]:33980 "EHLO cmsout01.mbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751757Ab1CPWHg (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:07:36 -0400 Received: from cmsout01.mbox.net (cmsout01-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3127A2ACB15 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:07:35 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4D81348D.2070803@usa.net> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:07:09 +0100 From: Issa Gorissen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ngene cam device name References: <4D7A97BB.4020704@gmail.com> <4D7B7524.2050108@linuxtv.org> <201103130042.49199@orion.escape-edv.de> <4D7CA0CC.8090308@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D7CA0CC.8090308@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: Sender: On 13/03/11 11:47, Martin Vidovic wrote: >> >> Btw, we should choose a more meaningful name for 'camX'. >> I would prefer something like cainoutX or caioX or cinoutX or cioX. >> > > > I agree, camX could be misleading since it's not necessarily a CAM > application. > > According to EN 50221 the two interfaces are named Command Interface > (for caX) > and Transport Stream Interface (for camX). Then maybe 'tsiX' would be > an appropriate > name? > > Anyway, 'cioX' sounds good too. I'll prepare the patch with caio (for conditional access I/O) if all agrees on it. tsi is a good candidate as it perfectly matches the standard specification, but then, ca should have been ci... -- Issa