From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:35393 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756932Ab1CRUUt (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:20:49 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so4060002fxm.19 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D83BE9B.6080600@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:20:43 +0100 From: Martin Vidovic MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Issa Gorissen CC: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, o.endriss@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ngene cam device name References: <4D7A97BB.4020704@gmail.com> <4D7B7524.2050108@linuxtv.org> <201103130042.49199@orion.escape-edv.de> <4D7CA0CC.8090308@gmail.com> <4D81348D.2070803@usa.net> In-Reply-To: <4D81348D.2070803@usa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: Sender: Issa Gorissen wrote: > On 13/03/11 11:47, Martin Vidovic wrote: > >>> Btw, we should choose a more meaningful name for 'camX'. >>> I would prefer something like cainoutX or caioX or cinoutX or cioX. >>> >>> >> I agree, camX could be misleading since it's not necessarily a CAM >> application. >> >> According to EN 50221 the two interfaces are named Command Interface >> (for caX) >> and Transport Stream Interface (for camX). Then maybe 'tsiX' would be >> an appropriate >> name? >> >> Anyway, 'cioX' sounds good too. >> > > I'll prepare the patch with caio (for conditional access I/O) if all > agrees on it. tsi is a good candidate as it perfectly matches the > standard specification, but then, ca should have been ci... > > -- > Issa > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Fine with me, as long as the name is stable. However, these issues still bother me: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg29022.html Regards, Martin