From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26135 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751565Ab1EIDK0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2011 23:10:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4DC75B0E.7030508@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 00:10:06 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Oberritter CC: Steve Kerrison , Antti Palosaari , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] DVB-T2 API updates, documentation and accompanying small fixes References: <4DC417DA.5030107@redhat.com> <1304869873-9974-1-git-send-email-steve@stevekerrison.com> <4DC6BF28.8070006@redhat.com> <1304875061.2920.13.camel@ares> <4DC71884.6040400@linuxtv.org> In-Reply-To: <4DC71884.6040400@linuxtv.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: Sender: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Em 08-05-2011 19:26, Andreas Oberritter escreveu: > On 05/08/2011 07:17 PM, Steve Kerrison wrote: >> Quick question about resubmission: >> >> Do I resubmit all 6 (5 after fold) patches as v2, or can I ignore what >> is currently patch 5 as it is uncommented? I don't know enough about >> patchwork to know whether changing the PATCH x/n will break things or >> what the proper procedure is. (RTFM with appropriate URL is an >> appropriate response to this, of course :) ) > > I think that previously submitted, now obsolete patches need to be > marked as superseded by hand in patchwork in any case. Yes, but I think that only me do such change at patchwork. Unfortunately, patchwork has an all or nothing access: it is either Read only or full access to all patches, even on delegate mode. I'll mark the old patches as superseded soon. Mauro. > > Regards, > Andreas