public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@maxwell.research.nokia.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/4] V4L: add three new ioctl()s for multi-size videobuffer management
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 15:17:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD8FEF4.9080505@maxwell.research.nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105221209480.8519@axis700.grange>

Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> 
>> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
>>> I don't understand this. We do _not_ want to allow holes in indices. For 
>>> now we decide to not implement DESTROY at all. In this case indices just 
>>> increment contiguously.
>>>
>>> The next stage is to implement DESTROY, but only in strict reverse order - 
>>> without holes and in the same ranges, as buffers have been CREATEd before. 
>>> So, I really don't understand why we need arrays, sorry.
>>
>> Well, now that we're defining a second interface to make new buffer
>> objects, I just thought it should be made as future-proof as we can. But
>> even with single index, it's always possible to issue the ioctl more
>> than once and achieve the same result as if there was an array of indices.
>>
>> What would be the reason to disallow creating holes to index range? I
>> don't see much reason from application or implementation point of view,
>> as we're even being limited to such low numbers.
> 
> I think, there are a few locations in V4L2, that assume, that for N number 
> of buffers currently allocated, their indices are 0...N-1. Just look for 
> loops like
> 
> 	for (buffer = 0; buffer < q->num_buffers; ++buffer) {
> 
> in videobuf2-core.c.

This code is in implementation of videobuf2, it's not the spec. We're
designing a new interface here and its behaviour musn't be restrained by
the current codebase. The videobuf2 must be changed to support the new
ioctls in any case; those functions must be fixed as the support for
CREATE_BUF and other new IOCTLs is added to videobuf2.

The above loop also likely assumes that the index of the first video
buffer to be allocated is zero; this would mean that no more than one
allocation of n buffers could be made, defeating the purpose of the new
interface.

Regards,

-- 
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@maxwell.research.nokia.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-22 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-01  8:12 [PATCH/RFC 0/4] V4L: new ioctl()s to support multi-sized video-buffers Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-01  8:13 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/4] V4L: add three new ioctl()s for multi-size videobuffer management Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-04  7:05   ` Hans Verkuil
2011-04-04  7:38     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-04  8:06       ` Hans Verkuil
2011-04-04  8:23         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-05 12:02         ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-05 12:40           ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-05 12:40           ` Hans Verkuil
2011-04-05 12:53             ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-05 11:59   ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-05 12:39     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-05 12:56       ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-05 14:53         ` Sakari Ailus
2011-04-05 12:21   ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-05 12:34     ` Hans Verkuil
2011-04-05 12:50       ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-05 12:52       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-05 12:58         ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-06 16:19       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-07  7:06         ` Hans Verkuil
2011-04-07  7:15           ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-07  7:50             ` Hans Verkuil
2011-04-07  8:53               ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-07  9:13                 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-04-07  9:17               ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-07  9:28                 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-04-11 11:27                   ` Sakari Ailus
2011-04-11  8:54   ` Sakari Ailus
2011-05-13  7:45   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-05-14 11:12     ` Hans Verkuil
2011-05-16 13:32     ` Sakari Ailus
2011-05-16 20:34       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-05-17  5:52         ` Sakari Ailus
2011-05-18 14:01           ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-05-18 14:48             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-05-18 19:58               ` Sakari Ailus
2011-06-06 13:10                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-06-06 17:28                   ` Sakari Ailus
2011-06-07 12:14                     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-06-08  9:04                       ` Sakari Ailus
2011-05-22 10:18           ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-05-22 12:17             ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2011-05-18 13:59     ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-05-18 15:15       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-05-18 18:02         ` Sakari Ailus
2011-04-01  8:13 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/4] V4L: add videobuf2 helper functions to support multi-size video-buffers Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-01 14:06   ` [PATCH/RFC 2/4 v2] " Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-03 17:34     ` Pawel Osciak
2011-04-04  7:55       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-05 12:42         ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-05 12:38     ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-05 13:01       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-01  8:13 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/4] V4L: soc-camera: add support for new multi-size video-buffer ioctl()s Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-01  8:13 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4] V4L: sh_mobile_ceu_camera: support multi-size video-buffers Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-03 17:34 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/4] V4L: new ioctl()s to support multi-sized video-buffers Pawel Osciak
2011-04-04  7:15   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-04-05 12:19     ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-04-05 12:48       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD8FEF4.9080505@maxwell.research.nokia.com \
    --to=sakari.ailus@maxwell.research.nokia.com \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox