Pach under review.

Pach under review.

[Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita]

Hi!

I would like to have my patch[1] ready for linux 3.0. It's a simple
one-liner to solve an easy to fix problem. Is there anything I can do
o accelerate the review process?

Please, CC me your answers as I'm not subscribed to the list.

Tanks!

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/849142/

Re: Pach under review.

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em 07-07-2011 23:12, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita escreveu:
> Hi!
> 
> I would like to have my patch[1] ready for linux 3.0. It's a simple
> one-liner to solve an easy to fix problem. Is there anything I can do
> o accelerate the review process?
> 
> Please, CC me your answers as I'm not subscribed to the list.
> 
> Tanks!
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/849142/


Hi Marco,

Hans is currently in vacations, so, we'll likely need to wait for his return.
I prefer to not rush merging it, because I don't have the pac207 datasheets,
and it is a good idea to have more tests on it. What webcams had you tested
needing such fix?

Thanks,
Mauro

Re: Pach under review.

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em 07-07-2011 23:12, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita escreveu:
> Hi!
> 
> I would like to have my patch[1] ready for linux 3.0. It's a simple
> one-liner to solve an easy to fix problem. Is there anything I can do
> o accelerate the review process?
> 
> Please, CC me your answers as I'm not subscribed to the list.
> 
> Tanks!
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/849142/


Hi Marco,

Hans is currently in vacations, so, we'll likely need to wait for his return.
I prefer to not rush merging it, because I don't have the pac207 datasheets,
and it is a good idea to have more tests on it. What webcams had you test
needing such fix?

Thanks,
Mauro

Re: Pach under review.

[Andy Walls]

Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:

>Em 07-07-2011 23:12, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita escreveu:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> I would like to have my patch[1] ready for linux 3.0. It's a simple
>> one-liner to solve an easy to fix problem. Is there anything I can do
>> o accelerate the review process?
>> 
>> Please, CC me your answers as I'm not subscribed to the list.
>> 
>> Tanks!
>> 
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/849142/
>
>
>Hi Marco,
>
>Hans is currently in vacations, so, we'll likely need to wait for his
>return.
>I prefer to not rush merging it, because I don't have the pac207
>datasheets,
>and it is a good idea to have more tests on it. What webcams had you
>tested
>needing such fix?
>
>Thanks,
>Mauro
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media"
>in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

FWIW, a PAC207 datasheet is on line here:

http://www.soiseek.com/PIXART/PAC207BCA/index.htm

Regards,
Andy

Re: Pach under review.

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em 08-07-2011 15:51, Andy Walls escreveu:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Em 07-07-2011 23:12, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita escreveu:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I would like to have my patch[1] ready for linux 3.0. It's a simple
>>> one-liner to solve an easy to fix problem. Is there anything I can do
>>> o accelerate the review process?
>>>
>>> Please, CC me your answers as I'm not subscribed to the list.
>>>
>>> Tanks!
>>>
>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/849142/
>>
>>
>> Hi Marco,
>>
>> Hans is currently in vacations, so, we'll likely need to wait for his
>> return.
>> I prefer to not rush merging it, because I don't have the pac207
>> datasheets,
>> and it is a good idea to have more tests on it. What webcams had you
>> tested
>> needing such fix?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mauro
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media"
>> in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> FWIW, a PAC207 datasheet is on line here:
> 
> http://www.soiseek.com/PIXART/PAC207BCA/index.htm

This doesn't help at all: there's no register descriptions on it.
> 
> Regards,
> Andy

Re: Pach under review.

[Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita]

On 7/8/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
> I prefer to not rush merging it, because I don't have the pac207 datasheets,
> and it is a good idea to have more tests on it. What webcams had you test
> needing such fix?
>

The camera I have this[1] one. It is identified as ID 093a:2460 Pixart
Imaging, Inc. Q-TEC WEBCAM 100.

[1] http://www.c3technology.com.br/index.asp?id_parametro=detalhe_produto&id=34