From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40921 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753018Ab1GOQC1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:02:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4E20648F.6080601@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:02:23 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guennadi Liakhovetski CC: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC] soc-camera: remove device and bus abstractions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em 15-07-2011 12:49, Guennadi Liakhovetski escreveu: > I'm currently working on removing "struct device" from "struct > soc_camera_device" and the "struct bus_type soc_camera_bus_type" bus. > Reasoning - well, I've just got enough of them;-) Everything, what they > are currently providing, can also be implemented directly. They served > their purpose during the active soc-camera API development as a nice > abstraction to build around, as debugging means, etc. But not, that also > subdevices have got their own "struct video_device" and with "struct > device" nodes embedded, I thi, we in v4l2 have (more than) enough devices > to satisfy all sysfs fans;-) Very welcome plan. > > So, this is just to let everyone know about my plans, don't know whether I > manage it for 3.1, or will have to postpone to 3.2. In any case if anyone > has any principle objections against this plan, please shout now! It is probably too late for 3.1, as the merge window will likely start next week. So, all patches for 3.1 are likely already submitted. Cheers, Mauro.