From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] V4L: add two new ioctl()s for multi-size videobuffer management
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:08:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E37B082.4090105@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1108011704290.30975@axis700.grange>
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>
>> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 13:44:28 Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>>>> Hi Hans and Guennadi,
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>> I realized that it is not clear from the documentation whether it is possible to call
>>>>>> VIDIOC_REQBUFS and make additional calls to VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS afterwards.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's actually a must if one wants to release buffers. Currently no other
>>>>> method than requesting 0 buffers using REQBUFS is provided (apart from
>>>>> closing the file handle).
>>>>
>>>> I was referring to the non-0 use-case :-)
>>>>
>>>>>> I can't remember whether the code allows it or not, but it should be clearly documented.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would guess no user application would have to call REQBUFS with other than
>>>>> zero buffers when using CREATE_BUFS. This must be an exception if mixing
>>>>> REQBUFS and CREATE_BUFS is not allowed in general. That said, I don't see a
>>>>> reason to prohibit either, but perhaps Guennadi has more informed opinion
>>>>> on this.
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Future functionality which would be nice:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Format counters. Every format set by S_FMT (or gotten by G_FMT) should
>>>>>>>>> come with a counter value so that the user would know the format of
>>>>>>>>> dequeued buffers when setting the format on-the-fly. Currently there are
>>>>>>>>> only bytesperline and length, but the format can't be explicitly
>>>>>>>>> determined from those.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, the index field will give you that information. When you create the
>>>>>> buffers you know that range [index, index + count - 1] is associated with that
>>>>>> specific format.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some hardware is able to change the format while streaming is ongoing (for
>>>>> example: OMAP 3). The problem is that the user should be able to know which
>>>>> frame has the new format.
>>>
>>> How exactly does this work or should it work? You mean, you just configure
>>> your hardware with new frame size parameters without stopping the current
>>> streaming, and the ISP will change frame sizes, beginning with some future
>>> frame? How does the driver then get to know, which frame already has the
>>
>> That's correct.
>>
>>> new sizes? You actually want to know this in advance to already queue a
>>> suitably sized buffer to the hardware?
>>
>> The driver knows that since it has configured the hardware to produce
>> that frame size.
>>
>> The assumption is that all the buffers have suitable size for all the
>> formats. This must be checked by the driver, something which also must
>> be taken into account.
>
> Hm, but do you then at all need different buffers?
Not in this case, but this is a different case after all: streaming with
buffers of different size, not still capture.
--
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@iki.fi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-02 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-20 8:43 [PATCH v3] V4L: add two new ioctl()s for multi-size videobuffer management Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-07-20 14:30 ` Sakari Ailus
2011-07-20 14:47 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-07-20 15:19 ` Sakari Ailus
2011-07-26 11:05 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-07-26 11:44 ` Sakari Ailus
2011-07-26 11:57 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-08-01 8:42 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-08-01 14:55 ` Sakari Ailus
2011-08-01 15:05 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-08-02 8:08 ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2011-08-02 8:20 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-08-02 10:45 ` Sakari Ailus
2011-08-02 11:11 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-08-02 13:46 ` Sakari Ailus
2011-08-02 14:28 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-07-28 10:26 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-07-26 10:41 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-07-27 13:11 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-07-28 10:28 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-07-28 4:11 ` Pawel Osciak
2011-07-28 6:56 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-07-28 12:29 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-07-28 12:42 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-07-29 7:59 ` Sakari Ailus
2011-07-30 4:21 ` Pawel Osciak
2011-07-30 13:50 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-07-30 17:06 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-08-01 10:55 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-08-02 8:15 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-08-02 8:33 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-08-03 15:29 ` Hans Verkuil
2011-08-03 22:18 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-08-04 8:57 ` Sakari Ailus
2011-08-02 21:38 ` Sakari Ailus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E37B082.4090105@iki.fi \
--to=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=pawel@osciak.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox