From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3142 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752191Ab1IYLm3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:42:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4E7F13A1.30103@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:42:25 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manu Abraham CC: LMML Subject: Re: Status of the patches under review at LMML (28 patches) References: <4E7DCE71.4030200@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em 24-09-2011 15:11, Manu Abraham escreveu: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: >> Everything at patchwork were reviewed by me, and I've applied all patches >> that I didn't notice any review by the drivers maintainers. >> >> Driver maintainers: >> Please review the remaining patches. >> >> == Patches for Manu Abraham review == >> >> Jun,11 2010: stb0899: Removed an extra byte sent at init on DiSEqC bus http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/3639 Florent AUDEBERT > > A single byte doesn't make much of a difference, but well it is still > a difference. The DiSEqC has some known issues and has some tricky > workarounds for different Silicon cuts. This patch *might* be good on > some chips while have an adverse effect. But that said I have not > tested this patch. > > If general users would like to have this patch and is proven good on > different versions, I have no objection for this patch to go in. > > In which case; Acked-by: Manu Abraham Ok. Well, let's apply it and see the feedbacks if any. Thanks for reviewing it! Mauro