From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@linuxtv.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
HoP <jpetrous@gmail.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:01:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDE0400.1070304@linuxtv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111206111829.GB17194@sirena.org.uk>
On 06.12.2011 12:18, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:20:03PM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>> On 05.12.2011 21:55, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> The USB case is quite different because your latency is very tightly
>>> bounded, your dead device state is rigidly defined, and your loss of
>>> device is accurately and immediately signalled.
>
>>> Quite different.
>
>> How can usbip work if networking and usb are so different and what's so
>> different between vtunerc and usbip, that made it possible to put usbip
>> into drivers/staging?
>
> USB-IP is a hack that will only work well on a tightly bounded set of
> networks - if you run it over a lightly loaded local network it can
> work adequately. This starts to break down as you vary the network
> configuration.
I see. So it has problems that vtunerc doesn't have.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-30 21:38 [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? HoP
2011-11-30 21:52 ` Michael Krufky
2011-12-01 0:09 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-01 11:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-01 14:58 ` HoP
2011-12-01 17:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-01 19:59 ` HoP
2011-12-01 20:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-01 22:55 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 11:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-02 11:40 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-02 11:48 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 12:05 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-02 11:57 ` HoP
2011-12-02 17:33 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[not found] ` <3D233F78EE854A4BA3D34C11AD4FAC1FDD141F@nasanexd01b.na.qualcomm.com>
2011-12-05 18:16 ` V4L2 driver node directory structure under /video directory Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-02 17:49 ` [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-02 18:16 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 18:28 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-02 23:19 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-03 0:37 ` HoP
2011-12-05 10:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2011-12-05 14:28 ` HoP
2011-12-05 15:16 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-05 15:18 ` Michael Krufky
2011-12-06 0:16 ` HoP
2011-12-05 17:39 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-05 20:41 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-05 20:55 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-05 21:20 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-05 21:54 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-06 11:18 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 12:01 ` Andreas Oberritter [this message]
2011-12-06 13:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 13:35 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:13 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 14:38 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 15:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 15:36 ` Manu Abraham
2011-12-06 11:21 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 12:01 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:19 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-06 14:48 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 13:49 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-07 14:01 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 16:10 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-07 16:56 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 16:58 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-07 21:48 ` Patrick Dickey
2011-12-07 22:53 ` Honza Petrouš
2011-12-07 23:55 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 17:19 ` Manu Abraham
2011-12-06 0:07 ` HoP
2011-12-06 13:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 13:49 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:19 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-06 15:05 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 14:20 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-12-06 15:00 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-06 17:35 ` HoP
2011-12-03 16:13 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-03 16:42 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-03 17:38 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-03 17:21 ` VDR User
2011-12-03 17:42 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-03 17:48 ` Devin Heitmueller
2011-12-04 23:54 ` HoP
2011-12-03 18:13 ` Hans Petter Selasky
2011-12-05 0:05 ` HoP
2011-12-03 18:17 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-12-03 23:30 ` Walter Van Eetvelt
2011-12-04 0:14 ` VDR User
2011-12-04 14:44 ` Alan Cox
2011-12-04 23:22 ` HoP
2011-12-05 1:45 ` VDR User
2011-12-05 6:20 ` HoP
2011-12-01 11:50 ` Communication misunderstanding? (was: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?) Patrick Boettcher
2011-12-01 12:33 ` [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device Rémi Denis-Courmont
2011-12-01 14:39 ` HoP
2011-12-02 18:32 ` [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? VDR User
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDE0400.1070304@linuxtv.org \
--to=obi@linuxtv.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jpetrous@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).