From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org,
pmatouse@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com, jbottomley@parallels.com,
mchristi@redhat.com, msnitzer@redhat.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: Broken ioctl error returns (was Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: fail SCSI passthrough ioctls on partition devices)
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:07:31 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F07A8E3.7010105@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F05F57A.2070007@infradead.org>
On 05-01-2012 17:09, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On 05-01-2012 15:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> Can you test the patch with some media capture apps (preferably with
>> the obvious fix for the problem that Paulo already pointed out -
>> although that won't actually matter until some block driver starts
>> using ENOIOCTLCMD there, so even the unfixed patch should mostly work
>> for testing)?
>
> Sure. I'm currently traveling, so I have just my "first aids kit" of devices
> but they should be enough for testing it. I'll return you as soon as I finish
> compiling the kernel on this slow 4 years-old notebook and run some
> tests with the usual applications.
I did a quick test today: didn't notice any regressions with the usual
applications.
Regards,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-07 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-05 17:02 Broken ioctl error returns (was Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: fail SCSI passthrough ioctls on partition devices) Linus Torvalds
2012-01-05 17:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-05 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-05 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-05 17:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-01-05 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-05 19:09 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-01-07 2:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2012-01-06 16:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-06 17:04 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F07A8E3.7010105@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=msnitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmatouse@redhat.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).