* [PATCH] stb0899: fix the limits for signal strength values
@ 2012-01-19 17:39 Klaus Schmidinger
2012-01-23 19:43 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Schmidinger @ 2012-01-19 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-media
stb0899_read_signal_strength() adds an offset to the result of the table lookup.
That offset must correspond to the lowest value in the lookup table, to make sure
the result doesn't get below 0, which would mean a "very high" value since the
parameter is unsigned.
'strength' and 'snr' need to be initialized to 0 to make sure they have a
defined result in case there is no "internal->lock".
Signed-off-by: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@tvdr.de>
--- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:54:32.000000000 +0200
+++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:23:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
* Crude linear extrapolation below -84.8dBm and above -8.0dBm.
*/
static const struct stb0899_tab stb0899_dvbsrf_tab[] = {
- { -950, -128 },
+ { -750, -128 },
{ -748, -94 },
{ -745, -92 },
{ -735, -90 },
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
{ -730, 13645 },
{ -750, 13909 },
{ -766, 14153 },
- { -999, 16383 }
+ { -950, 16383 }
};
/* DVB-S2 Es/N0 quant in dB/100 vs read value * 100*/
@@ -964,6 +964,7 @@
int val;
u32 reg;
+ *strength = 0;
switch (state->delsys) {
case SYS_DVBS:
case SYS_DSS:
@@ -987,7 +988,7 @@
val = STB0899_GETFIELD(IF_AGC_GAIN, reg);
*strength = stb0899_table_lookup(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab, ARRAY_SIZE(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab) - 1, val);
- *strength += 750;
+ *strength += 950;
dprintk(state->verbose, FE_DEBUG, 1, "IF_AGC_GAIN = 0x%04x, C = %d * 0.1 dBm",
val & 0x3fff, *strength);
}
@@ -1009,6 +1010,7 @@
u8 buf[2];
u32 reg;
+ *snr = 0;
reg = stb0899_read_reg(state, STB0899_VSTATUS);
switch (state->delsys) {
case SYS_DVBS:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] stb0899: fix the limits for signal strength values 2012-01-19 17:39 [PATCH] stb0899: fix the limits for signal strength values Klaus Schmidinger @ 2012-01-23 19:43 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2012-01-24 9:33 ` [linux-media] " Klaus Schmidinger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2012-01-23 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Klaus Schmidinger; +Cc: linux-media, Manu Abraham Hi Klaus, The patch didn't apply. It seems to be due to your emailer that mangled the whitespaces. The patch looks correct on my eyes. Yet, I'd like to have Manu's ack on it. Em 19-01-2012 15:39, Klaus Schmidinger escreveu: > stb0899_read_signal_strength() adds an offset to the result of the table lookup. > That offset must correspond to the lowest value in the lookup table, to make sure > the result doesn't get below 0, which would mean a "very high" value since the > parameter is unsigned. > 'strength' and 'snr' need to be initialized to 0 to make sure they have a > defined result in case there is no "internal->lock". > > Signed-off-by: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@tvdr.de> > > --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:54:32.000000000 +0200 > +++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:23:00.000000000 +0200 > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ > * Crude linear extrapolation below -84.8dBm and above -8.0dBm. > */ > static const struct stb0899_tab stb0899_dvbsrf_tab[] = { > - { -950, -128 }, > + { -750, -128 }, > { -748, -94 }, > { -745, -92 }, > { -735, -90 }, > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ > { -730, 13645 }, > { -750, 13909 }, > { -766, 14153 }, > - { -999, 16383 } > + { -950, 16383 } > }; > > /* DVB-S2 Es/N0 quant in dB/100 vs read value * 100*/ > @@ -964,6 +964,7 @@ > > int val; > u32 reg; > + *strength = 0; This is not needed, as strength is not initialized only on invalid delivery systems, where -EINVAL is returned. > switch (state->delsys) { > case SYS_DVBS: > case SYS_DSS: > @@ -987,7 +988,7 @@ > val = STB0899_GETFIELD(IF_AGC_GAIN, reg); > > *strength = stb0899_table_lookup(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab, ARRAY_SIZE(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab) - 1, val); > - *strength += 750; > + *strength += 950; > dprintk(state->verbose, FE_DEBUG, 1, "IF_AGC_GAIN = 0x%04x, C = %d * 0.1 dBm", > val & 0x3fff, *strength); > } > @@ -1009,6 +1010,7 @@ > u8 buf[2]; > u32 reg; > > + *snr = 0; This is not needed, as strength is not initialized only on invalid delivery systems, where -EINVAL is returned. > reg = stb0899_read_reg(state, STB0899_VSTATUS); > switch (state->delsys) { > case SYS_DVBS: PS.: Another alternative for it would be the enclosed patch, wich will be a little simpler, and will also preserve the slope on the boundary values, used at the stb0899_table_lookup() interpolation logic. Regards, Mauro - [PATCH] stb0899: fix the limits for signal strength values The current minimal measures for strengh is 750 - 950, for table stb0899_dvbsrf_tab[], and 750 - 999, for stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab[]. Both are negative values. However, the strength measure is unsigned. Don't allow negative values for strengh to underflow. Instead, shift the scale, in order to have 0 as the lowest strength. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c index 38565be..9cfdcb2 100644 --- a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c @@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static int stb0899_read_signal_strength(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u16 *strength) val = (s32)(s8)STB0899_GETFIELD(AGCIQVALUE, reg); *strength = stb0899_table_lookup(stb0899_dvbsrf_tab, ARRAY_SIZE(stb0899_dvbsrf_tab) - 1, val); - *strength += 750; + *strength += 950; dprintk(state->verbose, FE_DEBUG, 1, "AGCIQVALUE = 0x%02x, C = %d * 0.1 dBm", val & 0xff, *strength); } @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int stb0899_read_signal_strength(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u16 *strength) val = STB0899_GETFIELD(IF_AGC_GAIN, reg); *strength = stb0899_table_lookup(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab, ARRAY_SIZE(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab) - 1, val); - *strength += 750; + *strength += 999; dprintk(state->verbose, FE_DEBUG, 1, "IF_AGC_GAIN = 0x%04x, C = %d * 0.1 dBm", val & 0x3fff, *strength); } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-media] Re: [PATCH] stb0899: fix the limits for signal strength values 2012-01-23 19:43 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2012-01-24 9:33 ` Klaus Schmidinger 2012-01-24 12:16 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Klaus Schmidinger @ 2012-01-24 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-media [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5195 bytes --] On 23.01.2012 20:43, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hi Klaus, > > The patch didn't apply. It seems to be due to your emailer that mangled the > whitespaces. Sorry about that. Here it is again as an attachment. > The patch looks correct on my eyes. Yet, I'd like to have Manu's ack on it. > > Em 19-01-2012 15:39, Klaus Schmidinger escreveu: >> stb0899_read_signal_strength() adds an offset to the result of the table lookup. >> That offset must correspond to the lowest value in the lookup table, to make sure >> the result doesn't get below 0, which would mean a "very high" value since the >> parameter is unsigned. >> 'strength' and 'snr' need to be initialized to 0 to make sure they have a >> defined result in case there is no "internal->lock". >> >> Signed-off-by: Klaus Schmidinger<Klaus.Schmidinger@tvdr.de> >> >> --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:54:32.000000000 +0200 >> +++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:23:00.000000000 +0200 >> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ >> * Crude linear extrapolation below -84.8dBm and above -8.0dBm. >> */ >> static const struct stb0899_tab stb0899_dvbsrf_tab[] = { >> - { -950, -128 }, >> + { -750, -128 }, >> { -748, -94 }, >> { -745, -92 }, >> { -735, -90 }, >> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ >> { -730, 13645 }, >> { -750, 13909 }, >> { -766, 14153 }, >> - { -999, 16383 } >> + { -950, 16383 } >> }; >> >> /* DVB-S2 Es/N0 quant in dB/100 vs read value * 100*/ >> @@ -964,6 +964,7 @@ >> >> int val; >> u32 reg; >> + *strength = 0; > > This is not needed, as strength is not initialized only on invalid delivery systems, > where -EINVAL is returned. What about the 'if' conditions within the valid delivery system cases? For instance case SYS_DSS: if (internal->lock) { ... if (STB0899_GETFIELD(VSTATUS_LOCKEDVIT, reg)) { ... *strength = ... } } break; So there may be cases where strength has an undefined value, even if this function returns 0. >> switch (state->delsys) { >> case SYS_DVBS: >> case SYS_DSS: >> @@ -987,7 +988,7 @@ >> val = STB0899_GETFIELD(IF_AGC_GAIN, reg); >> >> *strength = stb0899_table_lookup(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab, ARRAY_SIZE(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab) - 1, val); >> - *strength += 750; >> + *strength += 950; >> dprintk(state->verbose, FE_DEBUG, 1, "IF_AGC_GAIN = 0x%04x, C = %d * 0.1 dBm", >> val& 0x3fff, *strength); >> } >> @@ -1009,6 +1010,7 @@ >> u8 buf[2]; >> u32 reg; >> >> + *snr = 0; > > This is not needed, as strength is not initialized only on invalid delivery systems, > where -EINVAL is returned. See above. >> reg = stb0899_read_reg(state, STB0899_VSTATUS); >> switch (state->delsys) { >> case SYS_DVBS: > > PS.: Another alternative for it would be the enclosed patch, > wich will be a little simpler, and will also preserve the slope > on the boundary values, used at the stb0899_table_lookup() > interpolation logic. Well, as long as there are no negative values for strength... However, I don't quite see why the range is 750 - 950 for DVB-S and 750 - 999 for DVB-S2. Shouldn't this be the same maximum value in both cases? Klaus > [PATCH] stb0899: fix the limits for signal strength values > > The current minimal measures for strengh is 750 - 950, for table > stb0899_dvbsrf_tab[], and 750 - 999, for stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab[]. > Both are negative values. However, the strength measure is unsigned. > > Don't allow negative values for strengh to underflow. Instead, > shift the scale, in order to have 0 as the lowest strength. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab<mchehab@redhat.com> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c > index 38565be..9cfdcb2 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c > @@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static int stb0899_read_signal_strength(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u16 *strength) > val = (s32)(s8)STB0899_GETFIELD(AGCIQVALUE, reg); > > *strength = stb0899_table_lookup(stb0899_dvbsrf_tab, ARRAY_SIZE(stb0899_dvbsrf_tab) - 1, val); > - *strength += 750; > + *strength += 950; > dprintk(state->verbose, FE_DEBUG, 1, "AGCIQVALUE = 0x%02x, C = %d * 0.1 dBm", > val& 0xff, *strength); > } > @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int stb0899_read_signal_strength(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u16 *strength) > val = STB0899_GETFIELD(IF_AGC_GAIN, reg); > > *strength = stb0899_table_lookup(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab, ARRAY_SIZE(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab) - 1, val); > - *strength += 750; > + *strength += 999; > dprintk(state->verbose, FE_DEBUG, 1, "IF_AGC_GAIN = 0x%04x, C = %d * 0.1 dBm", > val& 0x3fff, *strength); > } [-- Attachment #2: 03-stb0899_signal_strength_limits.diff --] [-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1705 bytes --] stb0899: fix the limits for signal strength values stb0899_read_signal_strength() adds an offset to the result of the table lookup. That offset must correspond to the lowest value in the lookup table, to make sure the result doesn't get below 0, which would mean a "very high" value since the parameter is unsigned. 'strength' and 'snr' need to be initialized to 0 to make sure they have a defined result in case there is no "internal->lock". Signed-off-by: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@tvdr.de> --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:54:32.000000000 +0200 +++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:23:00.000000000 +0200 @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ * Crude linear extrapolation below -84.8dBm and above -8.0dBm. */ static const struct stb0899_tab stb0899_dvbsrf_tab[] = { - { -950, -128 }, + { -750, -128 }, { -748, -94 }, { -745, -92 }, { -735, -90 }, @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ { -730, 13645 }, { -750, 13909 }, { -766, 14153 }, - { -999, 16383 } + { -950, 16383 } }; /* DVB-S2 Es/N0 quant in dB/100 vs read value * 100*/ @@ -964,6 +964,7 @@ int val; u32 reg; + *strength = 0; switch (state->delsys) { case SYS_DVBS: case SYS_DSS: @@ -987,7 +988,7 @@ val = STB0899_GETFIELD(IF_AGC_GAIN, reg); *strength = stb0899_table_lookup(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab, ARRAY_SIZE(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab) - 1, val); - *strength += 750; + *strength += 950; dprintk(state->verbose, FE_DEBUG, 1, "IF_AGC_GAIN = 0x%04x, C = %d * 0.1 dBm", val & 0x3fff, *strength); } @@ -1009,6 +1010,7 @@ u8 buf[2]; u32 reg; + *snr = 0; reg = stb0899_read_reg(state, STB0899_VSTATUS); switch (state->delsys) { case SYS_DVBS: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-media] Re: [PATCH] stb0899: fix the limits for signal strength values 2012-01-24 9:33 ` [linux-media] " Klaus Schmidinger @ 2012-01-24 12:16 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2012-01-24 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Klaus Schmidinger; +Cc: linux-media, Manu Abraham Em 24-01-2012 07:33, Klaus Schmidinger escreveu: > On 23.01.2012 20:43, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Hi Klaus, >> >> The patch didn't apply. It seems to be due to your emailer that mangled the >> whitespaces. > > Sorry about that. Here it is again as an attachment. Thanks! >> The patch looks correct on my eyes. Yet, I'd like to have Manu's ack on it. >> >> Em 19-01-2012 15:39, Klaus Schmidinger escreveu: >>> stb0899_read_signal_strength() adds an offset to the result of the table lookup. >>> That offset must correspond to the lowest value in the lookup table, to make sure >>> the result doesn't get below 0, which would mean a "very high" value since the >>> parameter is unsigned. >>> 'strength' and 'snr' need to be initialized to 0 to make sure they have a >>> defined result in case there is no "internal->lock". >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Schmidinger<Klaus.Schmidinger@tvdr.de> >>> >>> --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:54:32.000000000 +0200 >>> +++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:23:00.000000000 +0200 >>> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ >>> * Crude linear extrapolation below -84.8dBm and above -8.0dBm. >>> */ >>> static const struct stb0899_tab stb0899_dvbsrf_tab[] = { >>> - { -950, -128 }, >>> + { -750, -128 }, >>> { -748, -94 }, >>> { -745, -92 }, >>> { -735, -90 }, >>> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ >>> { -730, 13645 }, >>> { -750, 13909 }, >>> { -766, 14153 }, >>> - { -999, 16383 } >>> + { -950, 16383 } >>> }; >>> >>> /* DVB-S2 Es/N0 quant in dB/100 vs read value * 100*/ >>> @@ -964,6 +964,7 @@ >>> >>> int val; >>> u32 reg; >>> + *strength = 0; >> >> This is not needed, as strength is not initialized only on invalid delivery systems, >> where -EINVAL is returned. > > What about the 'if' conditions within the valid delivery system cases? > For instance > > case SYS_DSS: > if (internal->lock) { > ... > if (STB0899_GETFIELD(VSTATUS_LOCKEDVIT, reg)) { > ... > *strength = ... > } > } > break; > > So there may be cases where strength has an undefined value, even > if this function returns 0. Good point. I wandering why gcc didn't complain about that. >>> switch (state->delsys) { >>> case SYS_DVBS: >>> case SYS_DSS: >>> @@ -987,7 +988,7 @@ >>> val = STB0899_GETFIELD(IF_AGC_GAIN, reg); >>> >>> *strength = stb0899_table_lookup(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab, ARRAY_SIZE(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab) - 1, val); >>> - *strength += 750; >>> + *strength += 950; >>> dprintk(state->verbose, FE_DEBUG, 1, "IF_AGC_GAIN = 0x%04x, C = %d * 0.1 dBm", >>> val& 0x3fff, *strength); >>> } >>> @@ -1009,6 +1010,7 @@ >>> u8 buf[2]; >>> u32 reg; >>> >>> + *snr = 0; >> >> This is not needed, as strength is not initialized only on invalid delivery systems, >> where -EINVAL is returned. > > See above. > >>> reg = stb0899_read_reg(state, STB0899_VSTATUS); >>> switch (state->delsys) { >>> case SYS_DVBS: >> >> PS.: Another alternative for it would be the enclosed patch, >> wich will be a little simpler, and will also preserve the slope >> on the boundary values, used at the stb0899_table_lookup() >> interpolation logic. > > Well, as long as there are no negative values for strength... > However, I don't quite see why the range is 750 - 950 for DVB-S > and 750 - 999 for DVB-S2. Shouldn't this be the same maximum > value in both cases? This is a very good question. Unfortunately, I don't have the datasheets for this device. Manu shold be able to answer that better than me. Based on the table lookup routine, I suspect that what those tables are doing are to interpolate some log curve by breaking it into a few straight line segments. Changing from 999 to 950 will affect such interpolation. So, it is better to check this at the datasheets before changing from -999 to -950, or from -750 to -950. Manu, Could you please review it? Thanks! Mauro Em 24-01-2012 07:33, Klaus Schmidinger escreveu: > > stb0899: fix the limits for signal strength values > > stb0899_read_signal_strength() adds an offset to the result of the table lookup. > That offset must correspond to the lowest value in the lookup table, to make sure > the result doesn't get below 0, which would mean a "very high" value since the > parameter is unsigned. > 'strength' and 'snr' need to be initialized to 0 to make sure they have a > defined result in case there is no "internal->lock". > > Signed-off-by: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@tvdr.de> > > --- a/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:54:32.000000000 +0200 > +++ b/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stb0899_drv.c 2011-06-11 16:23:00.000000000 +0200 > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ > * Crude linear extrapolation below -84.8dBm and above -8.0dBm. > */ > static const struct stb0899_tab stb0899_dvbsrf_tab[] = { > - { -950, -128 }, > + { -750, -128 }, > { -748, -94 }, > { -745, -92 }, > { -735, -90 }, > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ > { -730, 13645 }, > { -750, 13909 }, > { -766, 14153 }, > - { -999, 16383 } > + { -950, 16383 } > }; > > /* DVB-S2 Es/N0 quant in dB/100 vs read value * 100*/ > @@ -964,6 +964,7 @@ > > int val; > u32 reg; > + *strength = 0; > switch (state->delsys) { > case SYS_DVBS: > case SYS_DSS: > @@ -987,7 +988,7 @@ > val = STB0899_GETFIELD(IF_AGC_GAIN, reg); > > *strength = stb0899_table_lookup(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab, ARRAY_SIZE(stb0899_dvbs2rf_tab) - 1, val); > - *strength += 750; > + *strength += 950; > dprintk(state->verbose, FE_DEBUG, 1, "IF_AGC_GAIN = 0x%04x, C = %d * 0.1 dBm", > val & 0x3fff, *strength); > } > @@ -1009,6 +1010,7 @@ > u8 buf[2]; > u32 reg; > > + *snr = 0; > reg = stb0899_read_reg(state, STB0899_VSTATUS); > switch (state->delsys) { > case SYS_DVBS: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-24 12:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-01-19 17:39 [PATCH] stb0899: fix the limits for signal strength values Klaus Schmidinger 2012-01-23 19:43 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2012-01-24 9:33 ` [linux-media] " Klaus Schmidinger 2012-01-24 12:16 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).