From: Sylwester Nawrocki <snjw23@gmail.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
sakari.ailus@iki.fi, g.liakhovetski@gmx.de, hdegoede@redhat.com,
moinejf@free.fr, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
riverful.kim@samsung.com, sw0312.kim@samsung.com,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v3 04/14] V4L: Add camera wide dynamic range control
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 19:33:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA01E81.7000701@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204301754.07602.hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Hi Hans,
On 04/30/2012 05:54 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday 30 April 2012 17:50:57 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On Friday 27 April 2012 16:23:21 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>> Add V4L2_CID_WIDE_DYNAMIC_RANGE camera class control for camera wide
>>> dynamic range (WDR, HDR) feature. This control has now only menu entries
>>> for enabling and disabling WDR. It can be extended when the wide dynamic
>>> range technique selection is needed.
>
> Never mind, I get it. It's for future expansion.
>
> That said, I find it dubious to make this an enum.
>
> I would go with a boolean control and perhaps make a remark that it might
> become an enum in the future if more options are needed.
Yes, my intention was to have something that would be easy to expand
without ABI perturbations. I believe in future there may be more
detailed control needed, than just WDR enable/disable.
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll revert this back to a boolean type
and add proper note in the documentation.
--
Regards,
Sylwester
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-01 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-27 14:23 [PATCH/RFC v3 00/14] V4L camera control enhancements Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 01/14] V4L: Add helper function for standard integer menu controls Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-30 15:20 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-04-30 15:37 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 02/14] V4L: Add camera exposure bias control Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 03/14] V4L: Add an extended camera white balance control Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:30 ` Hans de Goede
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 04/14] V4L: Add camera wide dynamic range control Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-30 15:50 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-04-30 15:54 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-01 17:33 ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 05/14] V4L: Add camera image stabilization control Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 06/14] V4L: Add camera ISO sensitivity controls Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 07/14] V4L: Add camera exposure metering control Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 08/14] V4L: Add camera scene mode control Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 09/14] V4L: Add camera 3A lock control Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-30 15:59 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-01 17:38 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 10/14] V4L: Add auto focus targets to the selections API Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 11/14] V4L: Add auto focus targets to the subdev " Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 12/14] V4L: Add camera auto focus controls Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 13/14] V4L: Add S5C73M3 sensor sub-device driver Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-27 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 14/14] vivi: Add controls Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-30 16:09 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-01 17:40 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-05-01 17:48 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-01 18:27 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-05-01 19:02 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-04-30 15:10 ` [PATCH/RFC v3 00/14] V4L camera control enhancements Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-04-30 16:11 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-01 17:58 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA01E81.7000701@gmail.com \
--to=snjw23@gmail.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=moinejf@free.fr \
--cc=riverful.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).