From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60063 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752494Ab2ECDaL (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2012 23:30:11 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPmk5-00047p-Oc for linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 05:30:09 +0200 Received: from d67-193-214-242.home3.cgocable.net ([67.193.214.242]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 05:30:09 +0200 Received: from brian by d67-193-214-242.home3.cgocable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 05:30:09 +0200 To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org From: "Brian J. Murrell" Subject: Re: HVR-1600 QAM recordings with slight glitches in them Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 23:29:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4FA1FBB5.8050106@interlinx.bc.ca> References: <1335307344.8218.11.camel@palomino.walls.org> <1335624964.2665.37.camel@palomino.walls.org> <4F9C38BE.3010301@interlinx.bc.ca> <4F9C559E.6010208@interlinx.bc.ca> <4F9C6D68.3090202@interlinx.bc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig608B93D80CB677CEADB65C02" Cc: stoth@kernellabs.com In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig608B93D80CB677CEADB65C02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12-04-29 08:09 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: >=20 > I don't know why you're not seeing valid data on femon with the 950q. > It should be printing out fine, and it's on the same 0.1 dB scale. > Try running just azap and see if the SNR is reported there. $ azap -c ~/last-channel-scan.prev 100-3 using '/dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0' and '/dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0' tuning to 651000000 Hz video pid 0x0000, audio pid 0x07c1 status 00 | signal 0000 | snr 0000 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 |=20 status 1f | signal 0000 | snr 0190 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0190 | snr 0190 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0190 | snr 0000 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0190 | snr 0000 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0000 | snr 0190 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0000 | snr 0190 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0190 | snr 0190 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0000 | snr 0190 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0190 | snr 0000 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0190 | snr 0000 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0190 | snr 0190 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0190 | snr 0190 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0190 | snr 0000 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK status 1f | signal 0000 | snr 0190 | ber 00000000 | unc 00000000 | FE_HAS= _LOCK =2E.. Doesn't seem to be useful values. =20 > This indeed feels like a marginal signal condition problem, and Andy's > assertion is well founded that the mxl5005/s5h1409 isn't exactly the > best combo compared to more modern tuners and demodulators (Hauppauge > switched to the tda18271 and s5h1411 for the newer revision of the > HVR-1600). Well, now that the coax connector has come loose on the digital tuner (i.e. it spins albeit with enough friction that screwing a coax connector= on and off is still quite doable but it would seem spins enough to have broken the connection internally and thus the tuner no longer receives signal) maybe it's time to cut my losses here and just consider this HVR-1600 garbage. I've wasted more than enough time on what's turned out to just be marginal hardware. ~sigh~ I wonder if I can still find the supported hardware rev. of the KWorld UB-435 around anywhere. The local computer store has one for $40 but they have no way of telling me if it's the new hardware rev. or the old one. Cheers, b. --------------enig608B93D80CB677CEADB65C02 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+h+7YACgkQl3EQlGLyuXBcCACfbmvRNB6r8Am/TvFf8yfUeQbj +TwAoJkDeIcWm4CfOmxukvjAY4cJwM8X =tYoR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig608B93D80CB677CEADB65C02--