Re: [RFCv1] DVB-USB improvements [alternative 2]

[Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>]

On 21.05.2012 03:36, VDR User wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Devin Heitmueller
> <dheitmueller@kernellabs.com>  wrote:
>> If you think this is important, then you should feel free to submit
>> patches to Antti's tree.  Otherwise, this is the sort of optimization
>> that brings so little value as to not really be worth the engineering
>> effort.  The time is better spent working on problems that *actually*
>> have a visible effect to users (and a few extra modules being loaded
>> does not fall into this category).
>>
>> I think you'll find after spending a few hours trying to abstract out
>> the logic and the ugly solution that results that it *really* isn't
>> worth it.
>
> So you think that it makes more sense to ignore existing issues rather
> than fix them. Isn't fixing issues&  flaws the whole point of an
> overhaul/redesign? Yes, it is. I do get the point you're trying to
> make -- there are bigger fish to fry. But this is not an urgent
> project and I disagree with the attitude to just disregard whatever
> you deem unimportant. If you're going to do it, do it right.

I am not sure what you trying to say. Do you mean I should try to get 
remote controller totally optional module which can be left out?

How much memory will be saved if remote can be left out as unloaded?

regards
Antti
-- 
http://palosaari.fi/