From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: halli manjunatha <hallimanju@gmail.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Discussion: How to deal with radio tuners which can tune to multiple bands
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 18:02:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC0FE9A.70603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBE8819.80704@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 05/24/2012 09:12 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/24/2012 05:00 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> I think / hope that covers everything we need. Suggestions ? Comments ?
>>
>> Modulators. v4l2_modulator needs a band field as well. The capabilities are
>> already shared with v4l2_tuner, so that doesn't need to change.
>
> Ah, yes modulators, good one, ack.
>
> Manjunatha, since the final proposal is close to yours, and you already have
> a patch for that including all the necessary documentation updates, can I ask
> you to update your patch to implement this proposal?
>
So I've been working a bit on adding AM support to the tea575x driver using
the agreed upon API, some observations from this:
1) There is no way to get which band is currently active
This is IMHO a big problem, a GUI radio app will quite likely when it starts get
all the current settings and display them without modifying any settings, so
it needs a way to find out which band is active.
2) What if first a band aware radio app sets a non default band, and then a
non band aware radio app comes along, it does a g_tuner on the default-band,
using the lo / high freq-s to build its UI, then the users picks a frequency,
and the app does a s_freq, and the result is a frequency outside of what the
app thinks are the lo / high freq limits because a different band is active ->
not good.
So I think we need to slightly modify the proposal, esp. to deal with 1), 2)
is a corner case and not really all that important on its own IMHO.
I suggest fixing 1) by not only adding a band field to v4l2_tuner, so that
the different ranges for different bands can be queried, but also adding
a band field to v4l2_frequency, so that the current active band can be
reported by g_frequency. Once we make g_frequency report the active band,
it makes sense to make s_frequency set the active band.
We would then need no changes to s_tuner at all, it will still only have
audmode as writeable setting and thus *not* set the active band. Effectively
s_tuner would just completely ignore the passed in band. Keeping audmode as
a global (not band specific) setting, and likewise g_tuner would always
return CAP_STEREO stereo if some bands are stereo capable.
This also nicely fixes 2). Since the reserved fields should be 0, so a
s_frequency by a non band aware app will set the band to the default band.
###
So here is a new / amended version of my band proposal:
1) Introduce the concept of bands, for radio tuners only
2) Define the following bands:
#define V4L2_BAND_DEFAULT 0
#define V4L2_BAND_FM_EUROPE_US 1 /* 87.5 Mhz - 108 MHz */
#define V4L2_BAND_FM_JAPAN 2 /* 76 MHz - 90 MHz */
#define V4L2_BAND_FM_RUSSIAN 3 /* 65.8 MHz - 74 MHz */
#define V4L2_BAND_FM_WEATHER 4 /* 162.4 MHz - 162.55 MHz */
#define V4L2_BAND_AM_MW 5
3) radio tuners indicate if they understand any of the non default bands
with the following tuner caps:
#define V4L2_TUNER_CAP_BAND_FM_EUROPE_US 0x00010000
#define V4L2_TUNER_CAP_BAND_FM_JAPAN 0x00020000
#define V4L2_TUNER_CAP_BAND_FM_RUSSIAN 0x00040000
#define V4L2_TUNER_CAP_BAND_FM_WEATHER 0x00080000
#define V4L2_TUNER_CAP_BAND_AM_MW 0x00100000
A (radio) tuner should always support RADIO_BAND_DEFAULT, so there is no
capability flag for this
4) Add a band field to v4l2_tuner, apps can query the exact rangelow and
rangehigh values for a specific band by doing a g_tuner with band set to
that band. All v4l2_tuner fields returned by g_tuner will be independent
of the selected band (iow constant) except for: rangelow, rangehigh,
rxsubchans and signal.
4a) rangelow, rangehigh will be the actual values for that band
4b) rxsubchans and signal will be 0 if a g_tuner is done for a band different
then the active band, for the active band they will reflect the actual values.
5) s_tuner will be completely unchanged, the band field will not influence
it, audmode will be a per tuner global, not a per band value
6) Add a band field to v4l2_frequency, on a g_frequency this will reflect the
current band, on a s_frequency this will set the current band
7) Doing a VIDIOC_S_HW_FREQ_SEEK will seek in the currently active band,
iow the band last set by a s_frequency call, this matches existing behavior where
the seek starts at the currently active frequency (so the frequency set by the
last s_frequency call, or the frequency from the last seek).
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-26 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-14 22:01 [PATCH V6 0/5] [Media] Radio: Fixes and New features for FM manjunatha_halli
2012-05-14 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 1/5] WL128x: Add support for FM TX RDS manjunatha_halli
2012-05-14 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 2/5] New control class and features for FM RX manjunatha_halli
2012-05-20 9:52 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-21 17:14 ` halli manjunatha
2012-05-23 18:29 ` Discussion: How to deal with radio tuners which can tune to multiple bands Hans de Goede
2012-05-23 19:24 ` halli manjunatha
2012-05-23 19:41 ` Hans de Goede
2012-05-24 15:00 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-24 19:12 ` Hans de Goede
2012-05-24 19:34 ` halli manjunatha
2012-05-26 16:02 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2012-05-26 16:40 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-26 18:09 ` Hans de Goede
2012-05-26 18:22 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-26 18:38 ` Hans de Goede
2012-05-26 19:12 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-27 9:06 ` Hans de Goede
2012-05-27 9:23 ` Hans Verkuil
2012-05-14 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 3/5] Add new CID for FM TX RDS Alternate Frequency manjunatha_halli
2012-05-14 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 4/5] Media: Update docs for V4L2 FM new features manjunatha_halli
2012-05-14 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 5/5] WL12xx: Add support for " manjunatha_halli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC0FE9A.70603@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hallimanju@gmail.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox