Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Introduce "non-pixel" sub node within iris video node

Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-07-02T12:06:20Z

On 02/07/2025 13:01, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>> Anyway, in other messages I explained what is missing. You are changing
>> existing hardware and you clearly must explain how existing hardware is
>> affected, how can we reproduce it, how users are affected.
> Exactly all of these i have explained in the commit message. The limitation with
> existing hardware binding usage and how my new approach mitigates that limition.
>
> Coming to usecase, i made a generic comment saying usecases which needs higher
> IOVA, i can add the explicit detail about usecase like 8k or higher
> concurrencies like 32 or higher concurrent sessions.

Why not make this change for a new SoC, instead of an existing ?

That way you don't have to make the argument for retrospective ABI changes.

---
bod