Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Introduce "non-pixel" sub node within iris video node

Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-07-02T22:26:10Z

On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 01:06:17PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 02/07/2025 13:01, Vikash Garodia wrote:
> > > Anyway, in other messages I explained what is missing. You are changing
> > > existing hardware and you clearly must explain how existing hardware is
> > > affected, how can we reproduce it, how users are affected.
> > Exactly all of these i have explained in the commit message. The limitation with
> > existing hardware binding usage and how my new approach mitigates that limition.
> >
> > Coming to usecase, i made a generic comment saying usecases which needs higher
> > IOVA, i can add the explicit detail about usecase like 8k or higher
> > concurrencies like 32 or higher concurrent sessions.
>
> Why not make this change for a new SoC, instead of an existing ?

Because we definitely want to improve support for older SoCs too.

>
> That way you don't have to make the argument for retrospective ABI changes.
>
> ---
> bod

--
With best wishes
Dmitry