From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9624 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752896Ab2HMVzN (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:55:13 -0400 Message-ID: <502977B8.8030201@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:55:04 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Devin Heitmueller CC: Walter Van Eetvelt , Hans Verkuil , linux-media , workshop-2011@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: RFC: V4L2 API ambiguities References: <201208131427.56961.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <8ed2a79057a0cc80ba058cebd97fd69d@mail.eetvelt.be> <50297418.4030906@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em 13-08-2012 18:42, Devin Heitmueller escreveu: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > wrote: >> No, it is not out of scope. The thing is that none of the developers >> that are going to be there proposed a DVB-specific themes, unfortunately. >> >> Yet, there are two themes there that are not V4L only: the userspace >> discussions and the SoC discussions. I expect that it will focus at >> the media API's as a hole, and not just V4L API. > > I'm talking specifically about a discussion of "V4L2 API Ambiguities", > which is the topic of this thread and the meeting in question. OK. With that regards, you're right. > I > realize other parts of the conference include DVB. If you want me to > start piling onto this thread will all the problems/deficiencies > related to our DVB API, we can certainly do that. However, none of > the people on this thread will have any real insight into them given > those individuals focus entirely on V4L2. Yeah, but anyway we can try to cover the points that Walter made during the DVB topics. I suspect, however, that we need an RFC with a proposal for CI decoupled from the demux, in order to be able to discuss it. Regards, Mauro