linux-media.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, a.hajda@samsung.com,
	laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl,
	kyungmin.park@samsung.com, sw0312.kim@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] V4L: Add s_rx_buffer subdev video operation
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:51:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50608F9D.40304@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120924134453.GH12025@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>

Hi Sakari,

On 09/24/2012 03:44 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> How about useing a separate video buffer queue for the purpose? That would
> provide a nice way to pass it to the user space where it's needed. It'd also
> play nicely together with the frame layout descriptors.

It's tempting, but doing frame synchronisation in user space in this case
would have been painful, if at all possible in reliable manner. It would 
have significantly complicate applications and the drivers.

VIDIOC_STREAMON, VIDIOC_QBUF/DQBUF calls would have been at least roughly
synchronized, and applications would have to know somehow which video nodes
needs to be opened together. I guess things like that could be abstracted
in a library, but what do we really gain for such effort ?
And now I can just ask kernel for 2-planar buffers where everything is in
place..


Regards,
Sylwester

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-24 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-24 13:26 [PATCH RFC] V4L: Add s_rx_buffer subdev video operation Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-09-24 13:44 ` Sakari Ailus
2012-09-24 13:58   ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-09-24 17:05     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-09-24 16:51   ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2012-09-24 18:26     ` Sakari Ailus
2012-09-25  9:48       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-09-26 20:49         ` Sakari Ailus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50608F9D.40304@samsung.com \
    --to=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    --cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).