* Fw: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Remove unreachable code
@ 2012-09-25 13:28 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-09-25 14:07 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2012-09-25 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sylwester Nawrocki; +Cc: Linux Media Mailing List
Hi Sylwester,
Please review.
Thanks!
Mauro
Forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:50:17 +0530
From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mchehab@infradead.org, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, k.debski@samsung.com, sachin.kamat@linaro.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Remove unreachable code
Code after return statement never gets executed.
Hence can be deleted.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
---
drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c | 21 +--------------------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
index e3e616d..56876be 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
@@ -1144,30 +1144,11 @@ static int s5p_mfc_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
struct s5p_mfc_dev *m_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- int ret;
if (m_dev->num_inst == 0)
return 0;
- return s5p_mfc_sleep(m_dev);
- if (test_and_set_bit(0, &m_dev->enter_suspend) != 0) {
- mfc_err("Error: going to suspend for a second time\n");
- return -EIO;
- }
- /* Check if we're processing then wait if it necessary. */
- while (test_and_set_bit(0, &m_dev->hw_lock) != 0) {
- /* Try and lock the HW */
- /* Wait on the interrupt waitqueue */
- ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(m_dev->queue,
- m_dev->int_cond || m_dev->ctx[m_dev->curr_ctx]->int_cond,
- msecs_to_jiffies(MFC_INT_TIMEOUT));
-
- if (ret == 0) {
- mfc_err("Waiting for hardware to finish timed out\n");
- return -EIO;
- }
- }
- return 0;
+ return s5p_mfc_sleep(m_dev);
}
static int s5p_mfc_resume(struct device *dev)
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Regards,
Mauro
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Fw: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Remove unreachable code
2012-09-25 13:28 Fw: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Remove unreachable code Mauro Carvalho Chehab
@ 2012-09-25 14:07 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-09-25 15:25 ` Sachin Kamat
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sylwester Nawrocki @ 2012-09-25 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List, Sachin Kamat, Kamil Debski
Hi Mauro, Sachin,
On 09/25/2012 03:28 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Sylwester,
>
> Please review.
I checked it with Kamil and it seems the code being removed
is required for proper driver operation. Thus please hold on
with this patch. We will prepare a different fix after testing.
Sachin, thanks for reporting that issue. The code below is needed
to make sure the MFC is fully suspended after s5p_mfc_suspend()
returns. The "return s5p_mfc_sleep(m_dev);" probably just needs
to be moved after the while loop.
> Thanks!
> Mauro
>
> Forwarded message:
>
> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:50:17 +0530
> From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
> To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: mchehab@infradead.org, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, k.debski@samsung.com, sachin.kamat@linaro.org, patches@linaro.org
> Subject: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Remove unreachable code
>
>
> Code after return statement never gets executed.
> Hence can be deleted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c | 21 +--------------------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
> index e3e616d..56876be 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
> @@ -1144,30 +1144,11 @@ static int s5p_mfc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> struct s5p_mfc_dev *m_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - int ret;
>
> if (m_dev->num_inst == 0)
> return 0;
> - return s5p_mfc_sleep(m_dev);
> - if (test_and_set_bit(0, &m_dev->enter_suspend) != 0) {
> - mfc_err("Error: going to suspend for a second time\n");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
>
> - /* Check if we're processing then wait if it necessary. */
> - while (test_and_set_bit(0, &m_dev->hw_lock) != 0) {
> - /* Try and lock the HW */
> - /* Wait on the interrupt waitqueue */
> - ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(m_dev->queue,
> - m_dev->int_cond || m_dev->ctx[m_dev->curr_ctx]->int_cond,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(MFC_INT_TIMEOUT));
> -
> - if (ret == 0) {
> - mfc_err("Waiting for hardware to finish timed out\n");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> - }
> - return 0;
> + return s5p_mfc_sleep(m_dev);
> }
>
> static int s5p_mfc_resume(struct device *dev)
--
Thanks,
Sylwester
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Fw: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Remove unreachable code
2012-09-25 14:07 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
@ 2012-09-25 15:25 ` Sachin Kamat
2012-09-25 15:55 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sachin Kamat @ 2012-09-25 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sylwester Nawrocki
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Linux Media Mailing List, Kamil Debski
Hi Sylwester,
On 25 September 2012 19:37, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Mauro, Sachin,
>
> On 09/25/2012 03:28 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hi Sylwester,
>>
>> Please review.
>
> I checked it with Kamil and it seems the code being removed
> is required for proper driver operation. Thus please hold on
> with this patch. We will prepare a different fix after testing.
>
> Sachin, thanks for reporting that issue. The code below is needed
> to make sure the MFC is fully suspended after s5p_mfc_suspend()
> returns.
OK.
The "return s5p_mfc_sleep(m_dev);" probably just needs
> to be moved after the while loop.
Do you want me to make this change and re-send the patch?
>
>> Thanks!
>> Mauro
>>
>> Forwarded message:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:50:17 +0530
>> From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>> To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: mchehab@infradead.org, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, k.debski@samsung.com, sachin.kamat@linaro.org, patches@linaro.org
>> Subject: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Remove unreachable code
>>
>>
>> Code after return statement never gets executed.
>> Hence can be deleted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c | 21 +--------------------
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
>> index e3e616d..56876be 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
>> @@ -1144,30 +1144,11 @@ static int s5p_mfc_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>> struct s5p_mfc_dev *m_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> - int ret;
>>
>> if (m_dev->num_inst == 0)
>> return 0;
>> - return s5p_mfc_sleep(m_dev);
>> - if (test_and_set_bit(0, &m_dev->enter_suspend) != 0) {
>> - mfc_err("Error: going to suspend for a second time\n");
>> - return -EIO;
>> - }
>>
>> - /* Check if we're processing then wait if it necessary. */
>> - while (test_and_set_bit(0, &m_dev->hw_lock) != 0) {
>> - /* Try and lock the HW */
>> - /* Wait on the interrupt waitqueue */
>> - ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(m_dev->queue,
>> - m_dev->int_cond || m_dev->ctx[m_dev->curr_ctx]->int_cond,
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(MFC_INT_TIMEOUT));
>> -
>> - if (ret == 0) {
>> - mfc_err("Waiting for hardware to finish timed out\n");
>> - return -EIO;
>> - }
>> - }
>> - return 0;
>> + return s5p_mfc_sleep(m_dev);
>> }
>>
>> static int s5p_mfc_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Sylwester
--
With warm regards,
Sachin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Fw: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Remove unreachable code
2012-09-25 15:25 ` Sachin Kamat
@ 2012-09-25 15:55 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sylwester Nawrocki @ 2012-09-25 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sachin Kamat
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Linux Media Mailing List, Kamil Debski
Hi Sachin,
On 09/25/2012 05:25 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Do you want me to make this change and re-send the patch?
No, there is no need. Kamil is investigating it and will prepare
required patch. Right now I'm not sure if the change suggested
is correct or not.
Thanks,
Sylwester
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-25 15:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-25 13:28 Fw: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Remove unreachable code Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-09-25 14:07 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-09-25 15:25 ` Sachin Kamat
2012-09-25 15:55 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).