Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: might_sleep() in dma_buf_unmap_attachment()

[Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>]

On Friday 28 September 2012 01:09 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 28-09-12 09:29, Rob Clark schreef:
>> From: Rob Clark <rob@ti.com>
>>
>> We never really clarified if unmap could be done in atomic context.
>> But since mapping might require sleeping, this implies mutex in use
>> to synchronize mapping/unmapping, so unmap could sleep as well.  Add
>> a might_sleep() to clarify this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <rob@ti.com>
>> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> ---
>>   drivers/base/dma-buf.c |    2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
>> index c30f3e1..877eacb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
>> @@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>   				struct sg_table *sg_table,
>>   				enum dma_data_direction direction)
>>   {
>> +	might_sleep();
>> +
>>   	if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf || !sg_table))
>>   		return;
>>
> Looks good to me!
>
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Thanks Rob,

Applied to for-next.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>