* Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: might_sleep() in dma_buf_unmap_attachment()
[not found] ` <50655414.2060400@canonical.com>
@ 2012-09-29 6:24 ` Sumit Semwal
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sumit Semwal @ 2012-09-29 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maarten Lankhorst
Cc: Rob Clark, dri-devel, linaro-mm-sig, linux-media, patches,
daniel.vetter, Rob Clark
On Friday 28 September 2012 01:09 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 28-09-12 09:29, Rob Clark schreef:
>> From: Rob Clark <rob@ti.com>
>>
>> We never really clarified if unmap could be done in atomic context.
>> But since mapping might require sleeping, this implies mutex in use
>> to synchronize mapping/unmapping, so unmap could sleep as well. Add
>> a might_sleep() to clarify this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <rob@ti.com>
>> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
>> index c30f3e1..877eacb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
>> @@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>> struct sg_table *sg_table,
>> enum dma_data_direction direction)
>> {
>> + might_sleep();
>> +
>> if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf || !sg_table))
>> return;
>>
> Looks good to me!
>
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Thanks Rob,
Applied to for-next.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread