From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:42216 "EHLO mail-ee0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753050Ab3AJVWn (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:22:43 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id d41so540868eek.28 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:22:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50EF311E.4010602@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:22:38 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manu Abraham CC: Oliver Schinagl , Michael Krufky , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Johannes Stezenbach , linux-media , jmccrohan@gmail.com, Christoph Pfister Subject: Re: [RFC] Initial scan files troubles and brainstorming References: <507FE752.6010409@schinagl.nl> <50D0E7A7.90002@schinagl.nl> <50EAA778.6000307@gmail.com> <50EAC41D.4040403@schinagl.nl> <20130108200149.GB408@linuxtv.org> <50ED3BBB.4040405@schinagl.nl> <20130109084143.5720a1d6@redhat.com> <20130109124158.50ddc834@redhat.com> <50EF0A4F.1000604@gmail.com> <50EF2155.5060905@schinagl.nl> <50EF256B.8030308@gmail.com> <50EF276C.1080101@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/10/2013 09:49 PM, Manu Abraham wrote: > On 1/11/13, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 01/10/2013 09:38 PM, Manu Abraham wrote: >>> The format can be definitely changed. There's no issue to it. >> >> No you cannot. Applications depend on that, it's part of the dvb ABI. If >> you changed that, you would do the same mistake as Mauro let it flowing >> through his tree and it was pointed out by Linus in the link you sent... > > I understand what you are thinking, but that's not exactly about it. The format > can simply be updated by adding newer params to it's end, thus not breaking > any of the applications. OK, but that still does not explain why it is requisite to have the data along with the sources. There is no problem in updating both the files and scandata separately, because it has to be compatible. Also I'm not sure whether adding a column at the end wouldn't break the apps. -- js