From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:65470 "EHLO mail-ee0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752930Ab3DOVBl (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:01:41 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id b15so2492086eek.35 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <516C6AFB.1060601@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:02:51 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?RnJhbmsgU2Now6RmZXI=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab CC: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: Patchwork and em28xx delegates References: <516C2DC8.8080203@googlemail.com> <20130415135018.3a867598@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130415135018.3a867598@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 15.04.2013 18:50, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: > Em Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:41:44 +0200 > Frank Schäfer escreveu: > >> I've just noticed that my 2 pending em28xx patches have got delegate >> assigned: >> >> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17834/ >> => delegated to mkrufky >> >> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17928/ (Obsoleted) >> => delegated to hverkuil >> >> Ist this a patchwork failure or is the new submaintainers workflow the >> reason ? > Sub-maintainers workflow. We expect that most patches will be applied via > one of the sub-maintainers. That will likely improve Kernel's quality and > help to reduce the maintainers overload. How is the em28xx driver split betweend the submaintainers ? Where should I send em28xx patches in the future ? You are still the em28xx maintainer, right ? Regards, Frank