From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22501 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751950Ab3FNHPG (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2013 03:15:06 -0400 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5E7F4s3006514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 03:15:05 -0400 Received: from shalem.localdomain (vpn1-4-110.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.110]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5E7F2o3014705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 03:15:03 -0400 Message-ID: <51BAC2F6.40708@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:15:02 +0200 From: Hans de Goede MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi All, IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a new stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the same time there have been no issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems stable). So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ? Regards, Hans