Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR)

Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR)

[Oliver Schinagl]

On 06/08/13 13:00, Duval Mickael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of 
> Cherbourg (France).
>
> Sorry for my poor English ;-)
>
> Thank you for your work.
Thank you, applied with commit 92bb3c2ec9da396c64f2f1f895292ebe0f510338

Oliver

P.S. Next time, try to set up your mail-client better to send patches 
out as text. Now it was mixed html and the patch worse. Git am didn't 
like it ;)

Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR)

[Oliver Schinagl]

On 06/13/13 19:10, Duval Mickael wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
>
> I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of Cherbourg
> FRANCE, modified with the last channels.
> I also enclose a package file that includes all channels available for
> DVB-T in France.
I've applied your patch (after manually working it over) last time.

What is in this zip? Please send a patch file what still needs to be 
adjusted. Cherbourg is in the repo now, isn't it?
>
> Sorry for my poor English ;-)
>
> Thank you.

Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR)

[Oliver Schinagl]

On 06/15/13 11:30, Duval Mickael wrote:
> Ok I have cloned your repo with Git, and I've make two patch files.
>
Can you explain to me why there are fr-All and fr-Cherbourg? (and 
fr-Bordeaux)?

Does fr-All not work for those two places? If fr-All does everything, 
it's ok to merge the other two in. nl-All is all transponders for the 
country as a lot of frequencies are shared. We could have 10 or so 
nl-<area> but they'd be all really small.

So is fr-All everything for the entire country, but has Cherbourg and 
Bordeaux extra, very different freq's?

Merged in c8050e8105b1b4b5364f57d8b3e658c80fb04a53 for now

Thanks,
oliver
>
> 2013/6/15 Duval Mickael <duvalmickael@gmail.com>:
>> In zip there is a little modification for city of cherbourg (add two
>> new muxes) and a fr_ALL for France all channels DVB-T initial
>> scan.
>>
>> What's the problem exactly with my files?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Duval Mickael
>>
>> 2013/6/14 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>:
>>> On 06/13/13 19:10, Duval Mickael wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of Cherbourg
>>>> FRANCE, modified with the last channels.
>>>> I also enclose a package file that includes all channels available for
>>>> DVB-T in France.
>>>
>>> I've applied your patch (after manually working it over) last time.
>>>
>>> What is in this zip? Please send a patch file what still needs to be
>>> adjusted. Cherbourg is in the repo now, isn't it?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for my poor English ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>

Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR)

[Oliver Schinagl]

On 15-06-13 12:08, Duval Mickael wrote:
> Indeed frequencies fr_Cherbourg and fr_Bordeaux are contained in fr_All.
> But I was thinking of doing a fr_All file and a specific file for all
> city as uk.
>
> With a file with only the useful frequency, detection will be much faster right?
Yes, if you only have to scan 5 frequencies instead of 20 of course it 
will be faster. But how often do you tune and how many frequencies are 
there to consider? If you have look at fr-All, that looks pretty small 
to me. Having 20 files covering those same frequencies will just add 
clutter to the db if you ask me. So I would keep with one fr-All if it 
works 'for everybody'.
>
> 2013/6/15 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>:
>> On 06/15/13 11:30, Duval Mickael wrote:
>>> Ok I have cloned your repo with Git, and I've make two patch files.
>>>
>> Can you explain to me why there are fr-All and fr-Cherbourg? (and
>> fr-Bordeaux)?
>>
>> Does fr-All not work for those two places? If fr-All does everything, it's
>> ok to merge the other two in. nl-All is all transponders for the country as
>> a lot of frequencies are shared. We could have 10 or so nl-<area> but they'd
>> be all really small.
>>
>> So is fr-All everything for the entire country, but has Cherbourg and
>> Bordeaux extra, very different freq's?
>>
>> Merged in c8050e8105b1b4b5364f57d8b3e658c80fb04a53 for now
>>
>> Thanks,
>> oliver
>>
>>> 2013/6/15 Duval Mickael <duvalmickael@gmail.com>:
>>>> In zip there is a little modification for city of cherbourg (add two
>>>> new muxes) and a fr_ALL for France all channels DVB-T initial
>>>> scan.
>>>>
>>>> What's the problem exactly with my files?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Duval Mickael
>>>>
>>>> 2013/6/14 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>:
>>>>> On 06/13/13 19:10, Duval Mickael wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>> I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of
>>>>>> Cherbourg
>>>>>> FRANCE, modified with the last channels.
>>>>>> I also enclose a package file that includes all channels available for
>>>>>> DVB-T in France.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've applied your patch (after manually working it over) last time.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is in this zip? Please send a patch file what still needs to be
>>>>> adjusted. Cherbourg is in the repo now, isn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry for my poor English ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>>

Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR)

[Oliver Schinagl]

On 16-06-13 10:15, Duval Mickael wrote:
> It is true that only scans once! It can therefore be quite limited at
> this fr_All file and remove fr_Cherbourg and fr_Bordeaux.
Allright, per your request I will merge Cherbourg and Bordeaux into 
fr-All (if there are missing frequencies) and I'll use your fr-All
>
> 2013/6/15 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>:
>> On 15-06-13 12:08, Duval Mickael wrote:
>>>
>>> Indeed frequencies fr_Cherbourg and fr_Bordeaux are contained in fr_All.
>>> But I was thinking of doing a fr_All file and a specific file for all
>>> city as uk.
>>>
>>> With a file with only the useful frequency, detection will be much faster
>>> right?
>>
>> Yes, if you only have to scan 5 frequencies instead of 20 of course it will
>> be faster. But how often do you tune and how many frequencies are there to
>> consider? If you have look at fr-All, that looks pretty small to me. Having
>> 20 files covering those same frequencies will just add clutter to the db if
>> you ask me. So I would keep with one fr-All if it works 'for everybody'.
>>
>>>
>>> 2013/6/15 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/15/13 11:30, Duval Mickael wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok I have cloned your repo with Git, and I've make two patch files.
>>>>>
>>>> Can you explain to me why there are fr-All and fr-Cherbourg? (and
>>>> fr-Bordeaux)?
>>>>
>>>> Does fr-All not work for those two places? If fr-All does everything,
>>>> it's
>>>> ok to merge the other two in. nl-All is all transponders for the country
>>>> as
>>>> a lot of frequencies are shared. We could have 10 or so nl-<area> but
>>>> they'd
>>>> be all really small.
>>>>
>>>> So is fr-All everything for the entire country, but has Cherbourg and
>>>> Bordeaux extra, very different freq's?
>>>>
>>>> Merged in c8050e8105b1b4b5364f57d8b3e658c80fb04a53 for now
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> oliver
>>>>
>>>>> 2013/6/15 Duval Mickael <duvalmickael@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In zip there is a little modification for city of cherbourg (add two
>>>>>> new muxes) and a fr_ALL for France all channels DVB-T initial
>>>>>> scan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's the problem exactly with my files?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Duval Mickael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/6/14 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/13/13 19:10, Duval Mickael wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of
>>>>>>>> Cherbourg
>>>>>>>> FRANCE, modified with the last channels.
>>>>>>>> I also enclose a package file that includes all channels available
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> DVB-T in France.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've applied your patch (after manually working it over) last time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is in this zip? Please send a patch file what still needs to be
>>>>>>> adjusted. Cherbourg is in the repo now, isn't it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry for my poor English ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>