* Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR) [not found] <CAMiis9aue=BJnGxhak9aKSXVtJPPB7df4WpKDdJL9Anw54en5Q@mail.gmail.com> @ 2013-06-09 9:33 ` Oliver Schinagl [not found] ` <CAMiis9ZiLXwX+E2TmjsYkA1iCowArrP5jTT4VgWCeA6gCUDJDQ@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Oliver Schinagl @ 2013-06-09 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Duval Mickael; +Cc: linux-media On 06/08/13 13:00, Duval Mickael wrote: > Hello, > > I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of > Cherbourg (France). > > Sorry for my poor English ;-) > > Thank you for your work. Thank you, applied with commit 92bb3c2ec9da396c64f2f1f895292ebe0f510338 Oliver P.S. Next time, try to set up your mail-client better to send patches out as text. Now it was mixed html and the patch worse. Git am didn't like it ;) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAMiis9ZiLXwX+E2TmjsYkA1iCowArrP5jTT4VgWCeA6gCUDJDQ@mail.gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <CAMiis9bZtgfX_zha6vL1HVcxrNJb0RFvP=45Mp44Eb1cuUTSFA@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR) [not found] ` <CAMiis9bZtgfX_zha6vL1HVcxrNJb0RFvP=45Mp44Eb1cuUTSFA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2013-06-14 21:50 ` Oliver Schinagl [not found] ` <CAMiis9ZgKKD3iiXchPcN=r9QCBjVvasmXjRn8rvmfzs33k-wPQ@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Oliver Schinagl @ 2013-06-14 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Duval Mickael, linux-media On 06/13/13 19:10, Duval Mickael wrote: > Hello, Hi, > > I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of Cherbourg > FRANCE, modified with the last channels. > I also enclose a package file that includes all channels available for > DVB-T in France. I've applied your patch (after manually working it over) last time. What is in this zip? Please send a patch file what still needs to be adjusted. Cherbourg is in the repo now, isn't it? > > Sorry for my poor English ;-) > > Thank you. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAMiis9ZgKKD3iiXchPcN=r9QCBjVvasmXjRn8rvmfzs33k-wPQ@mail.gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <CAMiis9a=nSvdueKfAJCU=JEuprQU_nSRtKx4u5-QKA2kUrEUZQ@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR) [not found] ` <CAMiis9a=nSvdueKfAJCU=JEuprQU_nSRtKx4u5-QKA2kUrEUZQ@mail.gmail.com> @ 2013-06-15 9:42 ` Oliver Schinagl [not found] ` <CAMiis9aDuu7xArvg7QOvbXmzVpwKUhETr+m=WEKnbSHbhPuLpA@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Oliver Schinagl @ 2013-06-15 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Duval Mickael, linux-media On 06/15/13 11:30, Duval Mickael wrote: > Ok I have cloned your repo with Git, and I've make two patch files. > Can you explain to me why there are fr-All and fr-Cherbourg? (and fr-Bordeaux)? Does fr-All not work for those two places? If fr-All does everything, it's ok to merge the other two in. nl-All is all transponders for the country as a lot of frequencies are shared. We could have 10 or so nl-<area> but they'd be all really small. So is fr-All everything for the entire country, but has Cherbourg and Bordeaux extra, very different freq's? Merged in c8050e8105b1b4b5364f57d8b3e658c80fb04a53 for now Thanks, oliver > > 2013/6/15 Duval Mickael <duvalmickael@gmail.com>: >> In zip there is a little modification for city of cherbourg (add two >> new muxes) and a fr_ALL for France all channels DVB-T initial >> scan. >> >> What's the problem exactly with my files? >> >> Thanks >> Duval Mickael >> >> 2013/6/14 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>: >>> On 06/13/13 19:10, Duval Mickael wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>>> >>>> I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of Cherbourg >>>> FRANCE, modified with the last channels. >>>> I also enclose a package file that includes all channels available for >>>> DVB-T in France. >>> >>> I've applied your patch (after manually working it over) last time. >>> >>> What is in this zip? Please send a patch file what still needs to be >>> adjusted. Cherbourg is in the repo now, isn't it? >>> >>>> >>>> Sorry for my poor English ;-) >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>> >>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAMiis9aDuu7xArvg7QOvbXmzVpwKUhETr+m=WEKnbSHbhPuLpA@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR) [not found] ` <CAMiis9aDuu7xArvg7QOvbXmzVpwKUhETr+m=WEKnbSHbhPuLpA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2013-06-15 20:44 ` Oliver Schinagl [not found] ` <CAMiis9bLv0TBuU_KBNFoDpjKzSBSy9JjaAYDicDRjtgf-6P7eA@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Oliver Schinagl @ 2013-06-15 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Duval Mickael, linux-media On 15-06-13 12:08, Duval Mickael wrote: > Indeed frequencies fr_Cherbourg and fr_Bordeaux are contained in fr_All. > But I was thinking of doing a fr_All file and a specific file for all > city as uk. > > With a file with only the useful frequency, detection will be much faster right? Yes, if you only have to scan 5 frequencies instead of 20 of course it will be faster. But how often do you tune and how many frequencies are there to consider? If you have look at fr-All, that looks pretty small to me. Having 20 files covering those same frequencies will just add clutter to the db if you ask me. So I would keep with one fr-All if it works 'for everybody'. > > 2013/6/15 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>: >> On 06/15/13 11:30, Duval Mickael wrote: >>> Ok I have cloned your repo with Git, and I've make two patch files. >>> >> Can you explain to me why there are fr-All and fr-Cherbourg? (and >> fr-Bordeaux)? >> >> Does fr-All not work for those two places? If fr-All does everything, it's >> ok to merge the other two in. nl-All is all transponders for the country as >> a lot of frequencies are shared. We could have 10 or so nl-<area> but they'd >> be all really small. >> >> So is fr-All everything for the entire country, but has Cherbourg and >> Bordeaux extra, very different freq's? >> >> Merged in c8050e8105b1b4b5364f57d8b3e658c80fb04a53 for now >> >> Thanks, >> oliver >> >>> 2013/6/15 Duval Mickael <duvalmickael@gmail.com>: >>>> In zip there is a little modification for city of cherbourg (add two >>>> new muxes) and a fr_ALL for France all channels DVB-T initial >>>> scan. >>>> >>>> What's the problem exactly with my files? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Duval Mickael >>>> >>>> 2013/6/14 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>: >>>>> On 06/13/13 19:10, Duval Mickael wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>>> I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of >>>>>> Cherbourg >>>>>> FRANCE, modified with the last channels. >>>>>> I also enclose a package file that includes all channels available for >>>>>> DVB-T in France. >>>>> >>>>> I've applied your patch (after manually working it over) last time. >>>>> >>>>> What is in this zip? Please send a patch file what still needs to be >>>>> adjusted. Cherbourg is in the repo now, isn't it? >>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for my poor English ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAMiis9bLv0TBuU_KBNFoDpjKzSBSy9JjaAYDicDRjtgf-6P7eA@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR) [not found] ` <CAMiis9bLv0TBuU_KBNFoDpjKzSBSy9JjaAYDicDRjtgf-6P7eA@mail.gmail.com> @ 2013-06-17 9:14 ` Oliver Schinagl 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Oliver Schinagl @ 2013-06-17 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Duval Mickael; +Cc: linux-media On 16-06-13 10:15, Duval Mickael wrote: > It is true that only scans once! It can therefore be quite limited at > this fr_All file and remove fr_Cherbourg and fr_Bordeaux. Allright, per your request I will merge Cherbourg and Bordeaux into fr-All (if there are missing frequencies) and I'll use your fr-All > > 2013/6/15 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>: >> On 15-06-13 12:08, Duval Mickael wrote: >>> >>> Indeed frequencies fr_Cherbourg and fr_Bordeaux are contained in fr_All. >>> But I was thinking of doing a fr_All file and a specific file for all >>> city as uk. >>> >>> With a file with only the useful frequency, detection will be much faster >>> right? >> >> Yes, if you only have to scan 5 frequencies instead of 20 of course it will >> be faster. But how often do you tune and how many frequencies are there to >> consider? If you have look at fr-All, that looks pretty small to me. Having >> 20 files covering those same frequencies will just add clutter to the db if >> you ask me. So I would keep with one fr-All if it works 'for everybody'. >> >>> >>> 2013/6/15 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>: >>>> >>>> On 06/15/13 11:30, Duval Mickael wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ok I have cloned your repo with Git, and I've make two patch files. >>>>> >>>> Can you explain to me why there are fr-All and fr-Cherbourg? (and >>>> fr-Bordeaux)? >>>> >>>> Does fr-All not work for those two places? If fr-All does everything, >>>> it's >>>> ok to merge the other two in. nl-All is all transponders for the country >>>> as >>>> a lot of frequencies are shared. We could have 10 or so nl-<area> but >>>> they'd >>>> be all really small. >>>> >>>> So is fr-All everything for the entire country, but has Cherbourg and >>>> Bordeaux extra, very different freq's? >>>> >>>> Merged in c8050e8105b1b4b5364f57d8b3e658c80fb04a53 for now >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> oliver >>>> >>>>> 2013/6/15 Duval Mickael <duvalmickael@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>> In zip there is a little modification for city of cherbourg (add two >>>>>> new muxes) and a fr_ALL for France all channels DVB-T initial >>>>>> scan. >>>>>> >>>>>> What's the problem exactly with my files? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Duval Mickael >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/6/14 Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/13/13 19:10, Duval Mickael wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of >>>>>>>> Cherbourg >>>>>>>> FRANCE, modified with the last channels. >>>>>>>> I also enclose a package file that includes all channels available >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> DVB-T in France. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've applied your patch (after manually working it over) last time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is in this zip? Please send a patch file what still needs to be >>>>>>> adjusted. Cherbourg is in the repo now, isn't it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry for my poor English ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-17 9:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAMiis9aue=BJnGxhak9aKSXVtJPPB7df4WpKDdJL9Anw54en5Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-09 9:33 ` DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR) Oliver Schinagl
[not found] ` <CAMiis9ZiLXwX+E2TmjsYkA1iCowArrP5jTT4VgWCeA6gCUDJDQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAMiis9bZtgfX_zha6vL1HVcxrNJb0RFvP=45Mp44Eb1cuUTSFA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-14 21:50 ` Oliver Schinagl
[not found] ` <CAMiis9ZgKKD3iiXchPcN=r9QCBjVvasmXjRn8rvmfzs33k-wPQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAMiis9a=nSvdueKfAJCU=JEuprQU_nSRtKx4u5-QKA2kUrEUZQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-15 9:42 ` Oliver Schinagl
[not found] ` <CAMiis9aDuu7xArvg7QOvbXmzVpwKUhETr+m=WEKnbSHbhPuLpA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-15 20:44 ` Oliver Schinagl
[not found] ` <CAMiis9bLv0TBuU_KBNFoDpjKzSBSy9JjaAYDicDRjtgf-6P7eA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-17 9:14 ` Oliver Schinagl
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox