From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 7of9.schinagl.nl ([88.159.158.68]:57372 "EHLO 7of9.schinagl.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754351Ab3FOUoJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:44:09 -0400 Message-ID: <51BCD217.8060608@schinagl.nl> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 22:44:07 +0200 From: Oliver Schinagl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Duval Mickael , linux-media Subject: Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR) References: <51B44BD5.2010208@schinagl.nl> <51BB9033.50709@schinagl.nl> <51BC36ED.3010405@schinagl.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 15-06-13 12:08, Duval Mickael wrote: > Indeed frequencies fr_Cherbourg and fr_Bordeaux are contained in fr_All. > But I was thinking of doing a fr_All file and a specific file for all > city as uk. > > With a file with only the useful frequency, detection will be much faster right? Yes, if you only have to scan 5 frequencies instead of 20 of course it will be faster. But how often do you tune and how many frequencies are there to consider? If you have look at fr-All, that looks pretty small to me. Having 20 files covering those same frequencies will just add clutter to the db if you ask me. So I would keep with one fr-All if it works 'for everybody'. > > 2013/6/15 Oliver Schinagl : >> On 06/15/13 11:30, Duval Mickael wrote: >>> Ok I have cloned your repo with Git, and I've make two patch files. >>> >> Can you explain to me why there are fr-All and fr-Cherbourg? (and >> fr-Bordeaux)? >> >> Does fr-All not work for those two places? If fr-All does everything, it's >> ok to merge the other two in. nl-All is all transponders for the country as >> a lot of frequencies are shared. We could have 10 or so nl- but they'd >> be all really small. >> >> So is fr-All everything for the entire country, but has Cherbourg and >> Bordeaux extra, very different freq's? >> >> Merged in c8050e8105b1b4b5364f57d8b3e658c80fb04a53 for now >> >> Thanks, >> oliver >> >>> 2013/6/15 Duval Mickael : >>>> In zip there is a little modification for city of cherbourg (add two >>>> new muxes) and a fr_ALL for France all channels DVB-T initial >>>> scan. >>>> >>>> What's the problem exactly with my files? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Duval Mickael >>>> >>>> 2013/6/14 Oliver Schinagl : >>>>> On 06/13/13 19:10, Duval Mickael wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>>> I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of >>>>>> Cherbourg >>>>>> FRANCE, modified with the last channels. >>>>>> I also enclose a package file that includes all channels available for >>>>>> DVB-T in France. >>>>> >>>>> I've applied your patch (after manually working it over) last time. >>>>> >>>>> What is in this zip? Please send a patch file what still needs to be >>>>> adjusted. Cherbourg is in the repo now, isn't it? >>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for my poor English ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>>