From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40743 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750750Ab3FQGe7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:34:59 -0400 Message-ID: <51BEAE0A.7060706@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:34:50 +0200 From: Hans de Goede MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guy Martin CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release References: <51BAC2F6.40708@redhat.com> <20130614103404.3dc2c4bf@redhat.com> <20130615123337.1ba83c63@borg.bxl.tuxicoman.be> In-Reply-To: <20130615123337.1ba83c63@borg.bxl.tuxicoman.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On 06/15/2013 12:33 PM, Guy Martin wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:34:04 -0300 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> Em Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:15:02 +0200 >> Hans de Goede escreveu: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up >>> to a new stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no >>> maintenance 0.8.x releases and a lot of interesting development >>> going on in the 0.9.x, while at the same time there have been no >>> issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems stable). >>> >>> So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 >>> release ? >> >> Fine for me. >> >> There are 5 patches floating at patchwork to improve the DVB-S >> support with different types of DiSEqC, but applying them would break >> library support for tvd. So, they won't be applied as-is, and Guy >> needs to take some other approach. As he is also planning to add >> support there for rotors, it looks ok to postpone such changes to a >> latter version. > > Can we wait a little bit more like a week max ? Sure, I was just trying to see what people think about doing a 1.0.0 release. I see no reason to rush it. Regards, Hans