From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 7of9.schinagl.nl ([88.159.158.68]:48881 "EHLO 7of9.schinagl.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932201Ab3FQJTb (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:19:31 -0400 Message-ID: <51BED36D.5050403@schinagl.nl> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:14:21 +0200 From: Oliver Schinagl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Duval Mickael CC: linux-media Subject: Re: DVB Scan file for Cherbourg (FR) References: <51B44BD5.2010208@schinagl.nl> <51BB9033.50709@schinagl.nl> <51BC36ED.3010405@schinagl.nl> <51BCD217.8060608@schinagl.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 16-06-13 10:15, Duval Mickael wrote: > It is true that only scans once! It can therefore be quite limited at > this fr_All file and remove fr_Cherbourg and fr_Bordeaux. Allright, per your request I will merge Cherbourg and Bordeaux into fr-All (if there are missing frequencies) and I'll use your fr-All > > 2013/6/15 Oliver Schinagl : >> On 15-06-13 12:08, Duval Mickael wrote: >>> >>> Indeed frequencies fr_Cherbourg and fr_Bordeaux are contained in fr_All. >>> But I was thinking of doing a fr_All file and a specific file for all >>> city as uk. >>> >>> With a file with only the useful frequency, detection will be much faster >>> right? >> >> Yes, if you only have to scan 5 frequencies instead of 20 of course it will >> be faster. But how often do you tune and how many frequencies are there to >> consider? If you have look at fr-All, that looks pretty small to me. Having >> 20 files covering those same frequencies will just add clutter to the db if >> you ask me. So I would keep with one fr-All if it works 'for everybody'. >> >>> >>> 2013/6/15 Oliver Schinagl : >>>> >>>> On 06/15/13 11:30, Duval Mickael wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ok I have cloned your repo with Git, and I've make two patch files. >>>>> >>>> Can you explain to me why there are fr-All and fr-Cherbourg? (and >>>> fr-Bordeaux)? >>>> >>>> Does fr-All not work for those two places? If fr-All does everything, >>>> it's >>>> ok to merge the other two in. nl-All is all transponders for the country >>>> as >>>> a lot of frequencies are shared. We could have 10 or so nl- but >>>> they'd >>>> be all really small. >>>> >>>> So is fr-All everything for the entire country, but has Cherbourg and >>>> Bordeaux extra, very different freq's? >>>> >>>> Merged in c8050e8105b1b4b5364f57d8b3e658c80fb04a53 for now >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> oliver >>>> >>>>> 2013/6/15 Duval Mickael : >>>>>> >>>>>> In zip there is a little modification for city of cherbourg (add two >>>>>> new muxes) and a fr_ALL for France all channels DVB-T initial >>>>>> scan. >>>>>> >>>>>> What's the problem exactly with my files? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Duval Mickael >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/6/14 Oliver Schinagl : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/13/13 19:10, Duval Mickael wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I send this email to you for a DVB-T scan file for the city of >>>>>>>> Cherbourg >>>>>>>> FRANCE, modified with the last channels. >>>>>>>> I also enclose a package file that includes all channels available >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> DVB-T in France. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've applied your patch (after manually working it over) last time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is in this zip? Please send a patch file what still needs to be >>>>>>> adjusted. Cherbourg is in the repo now, isn't it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry for my poor English ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>