From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 7of9.schinagl.nl ([88.159.158.68]:51025 "EHLO 7of9.schinagl.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753118Ab3GCTqZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:46:25 -0400 Message-ID: <51D47F8F.10906@schinagl.nl> Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 21:46:23 +0200 From: Oliver Schinagl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dirk@GNUmatic.de CC: =?UTF-8?B?SGVybWFubiBVbHJpY2hza8O2dHRlcg==?= , linux-media Subject: Re: [DTV Update] Re: =?UTF-8?B?w4RuZGVydW5nIGRlciBTZW5kZWZyZXF1ZQ==?= =?UTF-8?B?bnplbiBiZWkgS2FiZWxCVw==?= References: <51D452EC.5090008@gmx.de> <51D46548.8050904@schinagl.nl> <1372876350.31609.19.camel@twin.GNUmatic.de> In-Reply-To: <1372876350.31609.19.camel@twin.GNUmatic.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pushed to the dtv-scan-tables tree. A package should be generated thanks to mauro soon, so if packagers download tomorrow, or pull from git now, they have the new version. On 07/03/13 20:32, Dirk Ritter wrote: > Hello Oliver! :-) > > Am Mittwoch, den 03.07.2013, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Oliver Schinagl: > >>> Ich habe in der Datei in dieser Datei die einzig relevante Zeile von "C >>> 113000000 6900000 NONE QAM64" auf "C 114000000 6900000 NONE QAM256" korrigieren >>> müssen, so dass der Scan wieder geklappt hat. >> It looks like they changed frequencies. > > Yes. > >> Their site confirms that a big >> changeover happened in June. I have staged this commit and will push it >> tomorrow unless anybody objects, Dirk, can you confirm/deny this being >> correct? > > It is correct. I got an e-mail from Martin Klar who lives > in a KabelBW area that got the change earlier than mine. > I did wait for the change and can positively confirm it. > Based on data available (I did try to make sense of his > change beforehand) and based on testing done using Kaffeine > just after KabelBW changed it in Stuttgart. > >> I already have it in my private repo [0] > > Life took it's toll, so I didn't manage to forward this. > Martin already tried without any luck and that's why he > contacted me so that I could try. It was a rather difficult > story back then I first cooked it up since there was > disagreement between documents floating around and actual > frequencies used and as a result of further difficulties > with different tables for different service levels we > concluded it would be best to just have one frequency, > especially since that worked across both levels, i.e. for > both fully and partly populated network areas within KabelBW. > > I guess Martin would love to see the file changed as he > did, see attachment... ;-) > > BTW - what about Kaffeeine? How do they handle it? I > just changed it locally and it works, but I don't think > they did update it either. They probably maintain their own (bad). > > Hopefully, this will propagate fast... > > Cheers! > Dirk > oliver