From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:55446 "EHLO mail-bk0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754754Ab3HAS2N (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 14:28:13 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id je2so791275bkc.18 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gjasny04.ad.corp.expertcity.com ([78.108.113.8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm1073201bkj.6.2013.08.01.11.28.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51FAA8BA.302@googlemail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:28:10 +0200 From: Gregor Jasny MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: Doing a v4l-utils-1.0.0 release References: <51BAC2F6.40708@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51BAC2F6.40708@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@casper.infradead.org Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, On 6/14/13 9:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > IIRC the 0.9.x series were meant as development releases leading up to a > new > stable 1.0.0 release. Lately there have been no maintenance 0.8.x releases > and a lot of interesting development going on in the 0.9.x, while at the > same time there have been no issues reported against 0.9.x (iow it seems > stable). > > So how about taking current master and releasing that as a 1.0.0 release ? If nobody objects I'll do a 1.0.0 release this weekend. Thanks, Gregor