From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f52.google.com ([74.125.83.52]:62161 "EHLO mail-ee0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752073Ab3KBM64 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Nov 2013 08:58:56 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id e49so253845eek.25 for ; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 05:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5274F72F.10805@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 13:59:27 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RnJhbmsgU2Now6RmZXI=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab CC: Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated References: <20131031121301.23020.52079@www.linuxtv.org> In-Reply-To: <20131031121301.23020.52079@www.linuxtv.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 31.10.2013 13:13, schrieb Patchwork: > Hello, > > The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork: > > * linux-media: em28xx: make sure that all subdevices are powered on when needed > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/20422/ > - for: Linux Media kernel patches > was: New > now: Superseded This patch isn't superseeded. Guennadi didn't pick it up, so it's still up to you to review it. Regards, Frank > This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond. > > - > > Patches submitted to linux-media@vger.kernel.org have the following > possible states: > > New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches); > > Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically, > the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork > doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer. > If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the > MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML; > > Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the > same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first > version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was > superseeded by a git pull request. > > Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't > exist anymore. > > Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch; > > Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the > time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing > for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch. > > RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the > patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes: > - patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches > via git pull requests; > - patches with a very active community (typically from developers > working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are > needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be > happy with. > > Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via > the media-tree.git. > > Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied > via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied > either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree; > some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems, > etc); > > If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML. > > - > > This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at > patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit > your mail settings at: > http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/