* Re: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated [not found] <20131031121301.23020.52079@www.linuxtv.org> @ 2013-11-02 12:59 ` Frank Schäfer [not found] ` <5274F75D.3040107@googlemail.com> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Frank Schäfer @ 2013-11-02 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab; +Cc: Linux Media Mailing List Am 31.10.2013 13:13, schrieb Patchwork: > Hello, > > The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork: > > * linux-media: em28xx: make sure that all subdevices are powered on when needed > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/20422/ > - for: Linux Media kernel patches > was: New > now: Superseded This patch isn't superseeded. Guennadi didn't pick it up, so it's still up to you to review it. Regards, Frank > This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond. > > - > > Patches submitted to linux-media@vger.kernel.org have the following > possible states: > > New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches); > > Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically, > the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork > doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer. > If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the > MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML; > > Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the > same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first > version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was > superseeded by a git pull request. > > Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't > exist anymore. > > Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch; > > Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the > time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing > for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch. > > RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the > patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes: > - patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches > via git pull requests; > - patches with a very active community (typically from developers > working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are > needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be > happy with. > > Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via > the media-tree.git. > > Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied > via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied > either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree; > some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems, > etc); > > If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML. > > - > > This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at > patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit > your mail settings at: > http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <5274F75D.3040107@googlemail.com>]
* Re: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated [not found] ` <5274F75D.3040107@googlemail.com> @ 2013-11-02 16:39 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2013-11-03 12:29 ` Frank Schäfer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2013-11-02 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Frank Schäfer; +Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski, linux-media Em Sat, 02 Nov 2013 14:00:13 +0100 Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com> escreveu: > Am 31.10.2013 13:13, schrieb Patchwork: > > Hello, > > > > The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork: > > > > * linux-media: em28xx: make sure that all subdevices are powered on when needed > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/20422/ > > - for: Linux Media kernel patches > > was: New > > now: Superseded > This patch isn't superseeded. > Guennadi didn't pick it up, so it's still up to you to review it. >From what I understood, Guennadi's patch series made it obsolete. Right? If not, what's the usecase where this patch is needed? Regards, Mauro > > Regards, > Frank > > > This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond. > > > > - > > > > Patches submitted to linux-media@vger.kernel.org have the following > > possible states: > > > > New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches); > > > > Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically, > > the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork > > doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer. > > If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the > > MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML; > > > > Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the > > same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first > > version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was > > superseeded by a git pull request. > > > > Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't > > exist anymore. > > > > Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch; > > > > Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the > > time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing > > for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch. > > > > RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the > > patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes: > > - patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches > > via git pull requests; > > - patches with a very active community (typically from developers > > working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are > > needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be > > happy with. > > > > Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via > > the media-tree.git. > > > > Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied > > via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied > > either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree; > > some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems, > > etc); > > > > If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML. > > > > - > > > > This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at > > patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit > > your mail settings at: > > http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/ > -- Cheers, Mauro ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated 2013-11-02 16:39 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2013-11-03 12:29 ` Frank Schäfer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Frank Schäfer @ 2013-11-03 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab; +Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski, linux-media Am 02.11.2013 17:39, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: > Em Sat, 02 Nov 2013 14:00:13 +0100 > Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com> escreveu: > >> Am 31.10.2013 13:13, schrieb Patchwork: >>> Hello, >>> >>> The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork: >>> >>> * linux-media: em28xx: make sure that all subdevices are powered on when needed >>> - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/20422/ >>> - for: Linux Media kernel patches >>> was: New >>> now: Superseded >> This patch isn't superseeded. >> Guennadi didn't pick it up, so it's still up to you to review it. > From what I understood, Guennadi's patch series made it obsolete. > Right? Right, Guennadi's patch series doesn't need it anymore, but that doesn't make it obsolete. ;-) > If not, what's the usecase where this patch is needed? http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg67473.html So it's an attempt to fix a "ticking bomb". Regards, Frank > > Regards, > Mauro > >> Regards, >> Frank >> >>> This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond. >>> >>> - >>> >>> Patches submitted to linux-media@vger.kernel.org have the following >>> possible states: >>> >>> New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches); >>> >>> Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically, >>> the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork >>> doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer. >>> If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the >>> MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML; >>> >>> Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the >>> same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first >>> version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was >>> superseeded by a git pull request. >>> >>> Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't >>> exist anymore. >>> >>> Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch; >>> >>> Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the >>> time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing >>> for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch. >>> >>> RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the >>> patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes: >>> - patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches >>> via git pull requests; >>> - patches with a very active community (typically from developers >>> working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are >>> needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be >>> happy with. >>> >>> Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via >>> the media-tree.git. >>> >>> Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied >>> via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied >>> either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree; >>> some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems, >>> etc); >>> >>> If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML. >>> >>> - >>> >>> This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at >>> patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit >>> your mail settings at: >>> http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-03 12:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20131031121301.23020.52079@www.linuxtv.org>
2013-11-02 12:59 ` [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated Frank Schäfer
[not found] ` <5274F75D.3040107@googlemail.com>
2013-11-02 16:39 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-11-03 12:29 ` Frank Schäfer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox