public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
	David Cohen <dacohen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 PATCH 2/2] omap24xx/tcm825x: move to staging for future removal.
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 13:02:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AAF759.9010107@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131213112930.GU30652@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>

On 12/13/2013 12:29 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:26:33PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
>>
>> The omap24xx driver and the tcm825x sensor driver are the only two
>> remaining drivers to still use the old deprecated v4l2-int-device API.
>>
>> Nobody maintains these drivers anymore. But unfortunately the v4l2-int-device
>> API is used by out-of-tree drivers (MXC platform). This is a very bad situation
>> since as long as this deprecated API stays in the kernel there is no reason for
>> those out-of-tree drivers to convert.
>>
>> This patch moves v4l2-int-device and the two drivers that depend on it to
>> staging in preparation for their removal.
> 
> Do you think we should move these to staging instead of removing them right
> away? These drivers have never been in a usable state in the mainline
> kernel due to missing platform data. Currently they suffer from other
> problems, too. I'd be surprised if they compile.

They do compile, they are part of my daily build.

> 
> If I wanted to get them working again I'd start with this since it's not
> very far from the state where they used to work:
> 
> <URL:http://vihersipuli.retiisi.org.uk/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=~sailus/linux-omap/.git;a=summary>
> 
> The branch is n800-cam . Porting to up-to-date APIs can then be done, and I
> think David did some work to that end.
> 

I think I prefer to keep them in staging for at least one kernel release (3.14)
and drop them in 3.15.

Although if the consensus is to just drop them, then I won't object :-)

Regards,

	Hans

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-13 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-12 12:26 [RFCv2 PATCH 0/2] Move sn9c102 and omap24xx/tcm825x to staging Hans Verkuil
2013-12-12 12:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 1/2] sn9c102: prepare for removal by moving it " Hans Verkuil
2013-12-12 12:26 ` [RFCv2 PATCH 2/2] omap24xx/tcm825x: move to staging for future removal Hans Verkuil
2013-12-13 11:29   ` Sakari Ailus
2013-12-13 12:02     ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2013-12-13 12:08       ` Sakari Ailus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52AAF759.9010107@xs4all.nl \
    --to=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=dacohen@gmail.com \
    --cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox