public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@gmail.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] [media] stv090x: remove indent levels in stv090x_get_coldlock()
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:45:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53073C72.1060807@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140221085001.GA13078@elgon.mountain>



Am 21.02.2014 09:50, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> This code is needlessly complicated and checkpatch.pl complains that we
> go over the 80 characters per line limit.
> 
> If we flip the "if (!lock) {" test to "if (lock) return;" then we can
> remove an indent level from the rest of the function.
> 
> We can add two returns in the "if (state->srate >= 10000000) {"
> condition and move the else statement back an additional indent level.
> 
> There is another "if (!lock) {" check which can be removed since we have
> already checked "lock" and know it is zero at this point.  This second
> check on "lock" is also a problem because it sets off a static checker
> warning.  I have reviewed this code for some time to see if something
> else was intended, but have concluded that it was simply an oversight
> and should be removed.  Removing this duplicative check gains us an
> third indent level.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> v2: add the returns in the "if (state->srate >= 10000000) {" condition.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
> index 23e872f84742..93f4979ea6e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
> @@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ static int stv090x_get_coldlock(struct stv090x_state *state, s32 timeout_dmd)
>  
>  	u32 reg;
>  	s32 car_step, steps, cur_step, dir, freq, timeout_lock;
> -	int lock = 0;
> +	int lock;
>  
>  	if (state->srate >= 10000000)
>  		timeout_lock = timeout_dmd / 3;
> @@ -2154,98 +2154,96 @@ static int stv090x_get_coldlock(struct stv090x_state *state, s32 timeout_dmd)
>  		timeout_lock = timeout_dmd / 2;
>  
>  	lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_lock); /* cold start wait */
> -	if (!lock) {
> -		if (state->srate >= 10000000) {
> -			if (stv090x_chk_tmg(state)) {
> -				if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> -					goto err;
> -				if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> -					goto err;
> -				lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_dmd);
> -			} else {
> -				lock = 0;
> -			}
> -		} else {
> -			if      (state->srate <=  4000000)
> -				car_step = 1000;
> -			else if (state->srate <=  7000000)
> -				car_step = 2000;
> -			else if (state->srate <= 10000000)
> -				car_step = 3000;
> -			else
> -				car_step = 5000;
> -
> -			steps  = (state->search_range / 1000) / car_step;
> -			steps /= 2;
> -			steps  = 2 * (steps + 1);
> -			if (steps < 0)
> -				steps = 2;
> -			else if (steps > 12)
> -				steps = 12;
> -
> -			cur_step = 1;
> -			dir = 1;
> -
> -			if (!lock) {
> -				freq = state->frequency;
> -				state->tuner_bw = stv090x_car_width(state->srate, state->rolloff) + state->srate;
> -				while ((cur_step <= steps) && (!lock)) {
> -					if (dir > 0)
> -						freq += cur_step * car_step;
> -					else
> -						freq -= cur_step * car_step;
> -
> -					/* Setup tuner */
> -					if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> -						goto err;
> +	if (lock)
> +		return lock;
>  
> -					if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency) {
> -						if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency(fe, freq) < 0)
> -							goto err_gateoff;
> -					}
> +	if (state->srate >= 10000000) {
> +		if (stv090x_chk_tmg(state)) {
> +			if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> +				goto err;
> +			if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> +				goto err;
> +			return stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_dmd);
> +		}
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  
> -					if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth) {
> -						if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth(fe, state->tuner_bw) < 0)
> -							goto err_gateoff;
> -					}
> +	if (state->srate <= 4000000)
> +		car_step = 1000;
> +	else if (state->srate <= 7000000)
> +		car_step = 2000;
> +	else if (state->srate <= 10000000)
> +		car_step = 3000;
> +	else
> +		car_step = 5000;


hi dan, just a hint
when you encounter large numbers like this: please format it in a way
that it is easy to to see if a number is missing like:

        car_step = 5000;
	if      (state->srate <=  4000000)  car_step = 1000;
	else if (state->srate <=  7000000)  car_step = 2000;
	else    (state->srate <= 10000000)  car_step = 3000;


an other hint from the department of silly steps: do not add 0 in front
or you will searching for the bug a long time :)


just my 2 cents,

re,
 wh




>  
> -					if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> -						goto err;
> +	steps  = (state->search_range / 1000) / car_step;
> +	steps /= 2;
> +	steps  = 2 * (steps + 1);
> +	if (steps < 0)
> +		steps = 2;
> +	else if (steps > 12)
> +		steps = 12;
>  
> -					msleep(50);
> +	cur_step = 1;
> +	dir = 1;
>  
> -					if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> -						goto err;
> +	freq = state->frequency;
> +	state->tuner_bw = stv090x_car_width(state->srate, state->rolloff) + state->srate;
> +	while ((cur_step <= steps) && (!lock)) {
> +		if (dir > 0)
> +			freq += cur_step * car_step;
> +		else
> +			freq -= cur_step * car_step;
>  
> -					if (state->config->tuner_get_status) {
> -						if (state->config->tuner_get_status(fe, &reg) < 0)
> -							goto err_gateoff;
> -					}
> +		/* Setup tuner */
> +		if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> +			goto err;
>  
> -					if (reg)
> -						dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner phase locked");
> -					else
> -						dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner unlocked");
> +		if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency) {
> +			if (state->config->tuner_set_frequency(fe, freq) < 0)
> +				goto err_gateoff;
> +		}
>  
> -					if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> -						goto err;
> +		if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth) {
> +			if (state->config->tuner_set_bandwidth(fe, state->tuner_bw) < 0)
> +				goto err_gateoff;
> +		}
>  
> -					STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1c);
> -					if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT1, 0x00) < 0)
> -						goto err;
> -					if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT0, 0x00) < 0)
> -						goto err;
> -					if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> -						goto err;
> -					if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> -						goto err;
> -					lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, (timeout_dmd / 3));
> +		if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> +			goto err;
>  
> -					dir *= -1;
> -					cur_step++;
> -				}
> -			}
> +		msleep(50);
> +
> +		if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 1) < 0)
> +			goto err;
> +
> +		if (state->config->tuner_get_status) {
> +			if (state->config->tuner_get_status(fe, &reg) < 0)
> +				goto err_gateoff;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (reg)
> +			dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner phase locked");
> +		else
> +			dprintk(FE_DEBUG, 1, "Tuner unlocked");
> +
> +		if (stv090x_i2c_gate_ctrl(state, 0) < 0)
> +			goto err;
> +
> +		STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1c);
> +		if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT1, 0x00) < 0)
> +			goto err;
> +		if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, CFRINIT0, 0x00) < 0)
> +			goto err;
> +		if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
> +			goto err;
> +		if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
> +			goto err;
> +		lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, (timeout_dmd / 3));
> +
> +		dir *= -1;
> +		cur_step++;
>  	}
>  
>  	return lock;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2014-02-21 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-06  9:28 [patch] [media] stv090x: remove indent levels Dan Carpenter
2014-02-18  3:55 ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-18  8:56   ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-19  5:22     ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-19  7:44       ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-20  3:27         ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-20  9:25           ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-20 12:45             ` Manu Abraham
2014-02-20 10:24 ` Hans Verkuil
2014-02-20 12:35   ` Dan Carpenter
2014-02-21  8:50   ` [patch v2] [media] stv090x: remove indent levels in stv090x_get_coldlock() Dan Carpenter
2014-02-21 11:45     ` walter harms [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53073C72.1060807@bfs.de \
    --to=wharms@bfs.de \
    --cc=abraham.manu@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox