From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:60948 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751123AbaB1Iyq (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 03:54:46 -0500 Message-ID: <53104E91.6070109@linux-pingi.de> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:53:37 +0100 From: Karsten Keil MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Jens Axboe , Karsten Keil , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Michael Schmitz , Peter Zijlstra , linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] sleep_on removal, second try References: <1393412516-3762435-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <1393412516-3762435-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 26.02.2014 12:01, schrieb Arnd Bergmann: > It's been a while since the first submission of these patches, > but a lot of them have made it into linux-next already, so here > is the stuff that is not merged yet, hopefully addressing all > the comments. > > Geert and Michael: the I was expecting the ataflop and atari_scsi > patches to be merged already, based on earlier discussion. > Can you apply them to the linux-m68k tree, or do you prefer > them to go through the scsi and block maintainers? > > Jens: I did not get any comments for the DAC960 and swim3 patches, > I assume they are good to go in. Please merge. > > Hans and Mauro: As I commented on the old thread, I thought the > four media patches were on their way. I have addressed the one > comment that I missed earlier now, and used Hans' version for > the two patches he changed. Please merge or let me know the status > if you have already put them in some tree, but not yet into linux-next > > Greg or Andrew: The parport subsystem is orphaned unfortunately, > can one of you pick up that patch? > > Davem: The two ATM patches got acks, but I did not hear back from > Karsten regarding the ISDN patches. Can you pick up all six, or > should we wait for comments about the ISDN patches? > Ack on the ISDN stuff (12,13,14,15)