public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Cookson <steve.cookson@sca-uk.com>
To: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Comparisons of images between Dazzle DVC100, EasyCap stk1160 and Hauppauge ImapctVCB-e in Linux.
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:22:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5357DAC2.20005@sca-uk.com> (raw)

Hi Guys,

I would be interested in your views of the comparisons of these images.  
The still is the image of a duodenum taken during an endoscopy and 
recorded to a DVD player (via an s-video or composite cable).  Although 
the endoscope is an HD endoscope, the DVD recorder isn't and the 
resulting video is 720x480i59.94.

Here are further details of the video:-

Format : MPEG Video v2
Format profile : Main@Main
Format settings, BVOP : Yes, Matrix : Custom, GOP : M=3, N=15
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 4 566 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 10 000 Kbps
Width : 720 pixels
Height : 480 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 4:3
Frame rate : 29.970 fps
Standard : NTSC
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Interlaced
Scan order : Top Field First
Compression mode : Lossy
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.441

The video was played through Dragon Player and the video signal has 
exited through a mini-VGA port defined as 640x480 and passed through a 
VGA->S-Video converter to an s-video cable.

The cable has in turn been connected in turn to a Dazzle DVC100, an 
EasyCap stk1160 and a Hauppauge ImapctVCB-e.

Each setting (eg brightness and contrast etc) has as near as possible to 
mid-range and a screengrab taken.

The results are shown here:

Original: 
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcMrgmD6gSf74Ih4l5k2TGxc

Dazzle DVC100: 
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcMaOf4QTsIefYh4l5k2TGxc

ImpactVCB-e: 
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcM7i72IqGujuIh4l5k2TGxc

STK1160: 
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcPO7kmQk/IS94h4l5k2TGxc

I would be grateful for your views on the quality of the images.

Is one of materially higher quality than the others, or can I adjust the 
settings to improve the quality of one of them more.

It seems to me that the Hauppauge is marginally better than the others.  
What do you think?

Can I improve the test?

Regards

Steve.




             reply	other threads:[~2014-04-23 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-23 15:22 Steve Cookson [this message]
2014-04-25 12:19 ` Comparisons of images between Dazzle DVC100, EasyCap stk1160 and Hauppauge ImapctVCB-e in Linux Steve Cookson
     [not found]   ` <CALzAhNWvQ1ZYL-0rK2w7yPwzm9QyyCN8JvRyjGhq5eO6rOH9dw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-25 12:48     ` Steven Toth
2014-04-25 12:59       ` Hans Verkuil
2014-04-25 13:26   ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5357DAC2.20005@sca-uk.com \
    --to=steve.cookson@sca-uk.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox