From: Steve Cookson <steve.cookson@sca-uk.com>
To: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Comparisons of images between Dazzle DVC100, EasyCap stk1160 and Hauppauge ImapctVCB-e in Linux.
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:22:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5357DAC2.20005@sca-uk.com> (raw)
Hi Guys,
I would be interested in your views of the comparisons of these images.
The still is the image of a duodenum taken during an endoscopy and
recorded to a DVD player (via an s-video or composite cable). Although
the endoscope is an HD endoscope, the DVD recorder isn't and the
resulting video is 720x480i59.94.
Here are further details of the video:-
Format : MPEG Video v2
Format profile : Main@Main
Format settings, BVOP : Yes, Matrix : Custom, GOP : M=3, N=15
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 4 566 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 10 000 Kbps
Width : 720 pixels
Height : 480 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 4:3
Frame rate : 29.970 fps
Standard : NTSC
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Interlaced
Scan order : Top Field First
Compression mode : Lossy
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.441
The video was played through Dragon Player and the video signal has
exited through a mini-VGA port defined as 640x480 and passed through a
VGA->S-Video converter to an s-video cable.
The cable has in turn been connected in turn to a Dazzle DVC100, an
EasyCap stk1160 and a Hauppauge ImapctVCB-e.
Each setting (eg brightness and contrast etc) has as near as possible to
mid-range and a screengrab taken.
The results are shown here:
Original:
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcMrgmD6gSf74Ih4l5k2TGxc
Dazzle DVC100:
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcMaOf4QTsIefYh4l5k2TGxc
ImpactVCB-e:
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcM7i72IqGujuIh4l5k2TGxc
STK1160:
http://tinypic.com/usermedia.php?uo=fNkd6hpTbcPO7kmQk/IS94h4l5k2TGxc
I would be grateful for your views on the quality of the images.
Is one of materially higher quality than the others, or can I adjust the
settings to improve the quality of one of them more.
It seems to me that the Hauppauge is marginally better than the others.
What do you think?
Can I improve the test?
Regards
Steve.
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-23 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-23 15:22 Steve Cookson [this message]
2014-04-25 12:19 ` Comparisons of images between Dazzle DVC100, EasyCap stk1160 and Hauppauge ImapctVCB-e in Linux Steve Cookson
[not found] ` <CALzAhNWvQ1ZYL-0rK2w7yPwzm9QyyCN8JvRyjGhq5eO6rOH9dw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-25 12:48 ` Steven Toth
2014-04-25 12:59 ` Hans Verkuil
2014-04-25 13:26 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5357DAC2.20005@sca-uk.com \
--to=steve.cookson@sca-uk.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox