From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.kapsi.fi ([217.30.184.167]:39333 "EHLO mail.kapsi.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750706AbaGVAQ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:16:29 -0400 Message-ID: <53CDAD59.5050709@iki.fi> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 03:16:25 +0300 From: Antti Palosaari MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab CC: LMML , Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SDR stuff References: <53C874F8.3020300@iki.fi> <20140721205005.28e2e784.m.chehab@samsung.com> <20140721210510.5980d794.m.chehab@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <20140721210510.5980d794.m.chehab@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 07/22/2014 03:05 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> total: 1 errors, 45 warnings, 1517 lines checked >> >> drivers/media/usb/msi2500/msi2500.c has style problems, please review. > > FYI, I applied the rest of this patch series, except for those patches: > msi2500: move msi3101 out of staging and rename > MAINTAINERS: update MSI3101 / MSI2500 driver location > msi2500: change supported formats > msi2500: print notice to point SDR API is not 100% stable yet > > Because the latter ones depend on the first patch. Hey, just apply these too. As I explained, those are coming from new checkpatch checks added recently, after I have made that MSi3101/MSi2500 driver. We should not start begin run new checkpatch tests for old drivers. One reason I really want these out from staging is checkpatch terrorism newbies are doing in staging. There is all kind of people doing some eucalyptys challenge, running very latest checkpatch and sending useless patches for these driver, just wasting only my time. regards Antti -- http://palosaari.fi/