* [RFC PATCH] vb2: use pr_info instead of pr_debug
@ 2014-08-08 12:59 Hans Verkuil
2014-08-18 9:13 ` Marek Szyprowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hans Verkuil @ 2014-08-08 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Media Mailing List; +Cc: Marek Szyprowski, Pawel Osciak
Modern kernels enable dynamic printk support, which is fine, except when it is
combined with a debug module option. Enabling debug in videobuf2-core now produces
no debugging unless it is also enabled through the dynamic printk support in debugfs.
Either use a debug module option + pr_info, or use pr_debug without a debug module
option. In this case the fact that you can set various debug levels is very useful,
so I believe that for videobuf2-core.c we should use pr_info.
The mix of the two is very confusing: I've spent too much time already trying to
figure out why I am not seeing any debug output in the kernel log when I do:
echo 1 >/sys/modules/videobuf2_core/parameters/debug
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
index 0e3d927..0b59735 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ module_param(debug, int, 0644);
#define dprintk(level, fmt, arg...) \
do { \
if (debug >= level) \
- pr_debug("vb2: %s: " fmt, __func__, ## arg); \
+ pr_info("vb2: %s: " fmt, __func__, ## arg); \
} while (0)
#ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV_DEBUG
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] vb2: use pr_info instead of pr_debug
2014-08-08 12:59 [RFC PATCH] vb2: use pr_info instead of pr_debug Hans Verkuil
@ 2014-08-18 9:13 ` Marek Szyprowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2014-08-18 9:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans Verkuil, Linux Media Mailing List; +Cc: Pawel Osciak
Hello,
On 2014-08-08 14:59, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Modern kernels enable dynamic printk support, which is fine, except when it is
> combined with a debug module option. Enabling debug in videobuf2-core now produces
> no debugging unless it is also enabled through the dynamic printk support in debugfs.
>
> Either use a debug module option + pr_info, or use pr_debug without a debug module
> option. In this case the fact that you can set various debug levels is very useful,
> so I believe that for videobuf2-core.c we should use pr_info.
>
> The mix of the two is very confusing: I've spent too much time already trying to
> figure out why I am not seeing any debug output in the kernel log when I do:
>
> echo 1 >/sys/modules/videobuf2_core/parameters/debug
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> index 0e3d927..0b59735 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ module_param(debug, int, 0644);
> #define dprintk(level, fmt, arg...) \
> do { \
> if (debug >= level) \
> - pr_debug("vb2: %s: " fmt, __func__, ## arg); \
> + pr_info("vb2: %s: " fmt, __func__, ## arg); \
> } while (0)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV_DEBUG
>
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-18 9:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-08 12:59 [RFC PATCH] vb2: use pr_info instead of pr_debug Hans Verkuil
2014-08-18 9:13 ` Marek Szyprowski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).