From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:44385 "EHLO mail-wg0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751256AbaKBOAK (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2014 09:00:10 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id x12so9421931wgg.32 for ; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 06:00:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <545638E5.3010004@googlemail.com> Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 15:00:05 +0100 From: Gregor Jasny MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tskd08@gmail.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org CC: m.chehab@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] v4l-utils/libdvbv5: restore deleted functions to keep API/ABI compatible References: <1414929719-11748-1-git-send-email-tskd08@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1414929719-11748-1-git-send-email-tskd08@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/11/14 13:01, tskd08@gmail.com wrote: > From: Akihiro Tsukada > > dvb_new_freq_is_needed() was integrated to dvb_new_entry_is_needed(), > and dvb_scan_add_entry() was added a new parameter. > As those changes broke API/ABI compatibility, > restore the original functions. I suppose you introduced the new functions to generalize the API. Can't you keep the new functions and make dvb_new_freq_is_needed a thin wrapper around them? Thanks, Gregor