From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.kapsi.fi ([217.30.184.167]:37071 "EHLO mail.kapsi.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932394AbbCPW5e (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:57:34 -0400 Message-ID: <55075FDC.1030507@iki.fi> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:57:32 +0200 From: Antti Palosaari MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Larsson , Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] rtl2832: PID filter support for slave demod References: <55075559.50100@southpole.se> In-Reply-To: <55075559.50100@southpole.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/17/2015 12:12 AM, Benjamin Larsson wrote: > Is this structure ok for the slave pid implementation? Or should there > be only one filters parameter? Will the overlaying pid filter framework > properly "flush" the set pid filters ? > > Note that this code currently is only compile tested. I am fine with it. byw. Have you tested if your QAM256 (DVB-C or DVB-T2) stream is valid even without a PID filtering? IIRC mine stream is correct and PID filtering is not required (but surely it could be implemented if you wish). regards Antti -- http://palosaari.fi/