From: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: S_CTRL must be called twice to set volatile controls
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:37:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5540D09F.9010303@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150429120128.GJ3188@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
Hi Sakari,
On 04/29/2015 02:01 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:58:20AM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> On 04/29/2015 09:53 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> Hi Jacek,
>>>
>>> On 04/29/15 09:33, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> After testing my v4l2-flash helpers patch [1] with the recent patches
>>>> for v4l2-ctrl.c ([2] and [3]) s_ctrl op isn't called despite setting
>>>> the value that should be aligned to the other step than default one.
>>>>
>>>> This happens for V4L2_CID_FLASH_TORCH_INTENSITY control with
>>>> V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_VOLATILE flag.
>>>>
>>>> The situation improves after setting V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_EXECUTE_ON_WRITE
>>>> flag for the control. Is this flag required now for volatile controls
>>>> to be writable?
>>>
>>> Yes, you need that if you want to be able to write to a volatile control.
>>>
>>> It was added for exactly that purpose.
>>
>> Thanks for the explanation.
>>
>>> Why is V4L2_CID_FLASH_TORCH_INTENSITY volatile? Volatile typically only
>>> makes sense if the hardware itself is modifying the value without the
>>> software knowing about it.
>>
>> This can be the case for the flash LED devices that can reduce torch
>> current when battery voltage level falls below predefined threshold.
>
> Can the LED flash actually tell about this, other than reading this through
> the faults?
MAX77693-flash device supports this.
> I don't know of a LED flash that could do this, so I wonder if
> we could make these controls non-volatile, as the reason I originally though
> why they were volatile (the V4L2 control framework being more or less just a
> front-end) was not a valid one.
The other reason for keeping the controls volatile is the fact that
LED subsystem has brightness_get op, which can be implemented by
drivers to report the current level actually set.
> I guess this could be done later on on top of the patch you currently have.
>
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-29 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-29 7:33 S_CTRL must be called twice to set volatile controls Jacek Anaszewski
2015-04-29 7:53 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-04-29 8:58 ` Jacek Anaszewski
2015-04-29 12:01 ` Sakari Ailus
2015-04-29 12:37 ` Jacek Anaszewski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5540D09F.9010303@samsung.com \
--to=j.anaszewski@samsung.com \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=hansverk@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox