From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:60138 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751129AbbE0LPZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 07:15:25 -0400 Message-ID: <5565A740.2020707@ti.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 14:15:12 +0300 From: Peter Ujfalusi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] spi: omap2-mcspi: Support for deferred probing when requesting DMA channels References: <1432646768-12532-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1432646768-12532-12-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20150526152730.GT21577@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20150526152730.GT21577@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mark, On 05/26/2015 06:27 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:26:06PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > >> Switch to use ma_request_slave_channel_compat_reason() to request the DMA >> channels. Only fall back to pio mode if the error code returned is not >> -EPROBE_DEFER, otherwise return from the probe with the -EPROBE_DEFER. > > I've got two patches from a patch series here with no cover letter... > I'm guessing there's no interdependencies or anything? Please always > ensure that when sending a patch series everyone getting the patches can > tell what the series as a whole looks like (if there's no dependencies > consider posting as individual patches rather than a series). I have put the maintainers of the relevant subsystems as CC in the commit message and sent the series to all of the mailing lists. This series was touching 7 subsystems and I thought not spamming every maintainer with all the mails might be better. In v2 I will keep this in mind. The series depends on the first two patch, which adds the dma_request_slave_channel_compat_reason() function. -- Péter