Re: [ATTN 0/9] SDR transmitter API

[Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>]

On 06/05/2015 12:25 PM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 12:50 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Hi Antti,
>>
>> FYI: don't use ATTN as prefix: patchwork doesn't pick that up as a patch,
>> and if it doesn't appear there, then it is likely to be forgotten.
>>
>> Can you repost it with the correct prefix? It's so much easier to process
>> for me if it ends up in patchwork...
> 
> Which is correct prefix?

Just [PATCH] is enough.

> 
> Earlier I used PATCH RFC, but then I saw that ATTN:
> [ANN] Report on the San Jose V4L/DVB mini-summit
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg76281.html
> 
> - Add 'ATTN' inside pull request subject line tp indicate that Mauro's 
> (or some other maintainer's) attention is required. Should be limited to 
> api changes, dependencies.
> 
> OK, it speaks only pull request, but that was patchset having API changes...

ATTN is only for urgent pull requests for the current rc kernel, it doesn't
apply to patches.

[PATCH RFC] means that it is not yet ready to be merged, but just [PATCH] indicates
that it should be OK to merge (at least according to the submitter!).

Regards,

	Hans